On 11/15/2014 01:14 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>>> Excellent. I suggest you provide git patches for the rtems-tools.git repo
>>> to add the patches and then provide RSB patches for the sparc gdb build to
>>> use them. There are specific sparc patches already present which need
>>> updating as the
On 11/15/2014 10:56 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/15/2014 05:28 PM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
>> Ralf,
>>
>> I agree that a "Community Code of Conduct" might be formulated that
>> enables it to be used as a means of oppression. But we are talking about
>> a certain recommended document code. Read
On 11/15/2014 05:28 PM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
Ralf,
I agree that a "Community Code of Conduct" might be formulated that
enables it to be used as a means of oppression. But we are talking about
a certain recommended document code. Reading it I do not see any request
which seem inappropriate. And
Ralf,
I agree that a "Community Code of Conduct" might be formulated that
enables it to be used as a means of oppression. But we are talking about
a certain recommended document code. Reading it I do not see any request
which seem inappropriate. And "breaking" the code would not mean to be
silentl
On 11/12/2014 08:49 PM, Thomas Doerfler wrote:
What I don't understand in your posting: On the one hand you mention,
that the topics of the proposed CCoC have never been an issue on the
RTEMS list and on the other hand you point out, that other CCoCs on
other lists may have made some users leave
