Hi, thanks for all your replies.
2014-08-14 15:38 GMT+02:00 Joel Sherrill :
>
> On 8/13/2014 10:13 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 14/08/2014 7:34 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> The other part is in covoar itself. As it processes each exe and builds
> >> the internal
> >> database of information, it
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/Makefile.am | 9 +++-
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/preinstall.am | 72 -
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/preinstall.am | 3 +-
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/Makefile.am
---
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/make/custom/or1k_or1ksim.cfg | 7 ---
c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/make/custom/or1ksim.cfg | 7 +++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 c/src/lib/libbsp/or1k/or1ksim/make/custom/or1k_or1ksim.cfg
create mode 100644 c/
---
cpukit/librpc/src/xdr/xdr_float.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/cpukit/librpc/src/xdr/xdr_float.c
b/cpukit/librpc/src/xdr/xdr_float.c
index 8640058..cf081a7 100644
--- a/cpukit/librpc/src/xdr/xdr_float.c
+++ b/cpukit/librpc/src/xdr/xdr_float.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static ch
---
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/Makefile.am | 20 +++
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/configure.ac | 31 +
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/preinstall.am | 24 ++
c/src/lib/libcpu/or1k/shared/cache/cache_.h | 11 ++
4 files ch
---
testsuites/sptests/spcache01/init.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/testsuites/sptests/spcache01/init.c
b/testsuites/sptests/spcache01/init.c
index 2c9d184..ad9b54f 100644
--- a/testsuites/sptests/spcache01/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/sptests/spcache01/ini
On Friday 22 of August 2014 17:24:41 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
>
> wrote:
> > Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> > rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
> >
> > FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. J
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
>
> On August 22, 2014 11:44:11 AM CDT, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>>Hello Joel,
>>
>>On Friday 22 of August 2014 17:25:24 Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> Pushed.
>>>
>>> Followups can just be subsequent patches.
>>
>>thanks, you are faster than light ...
>
On August 22, 2014 11:44:11 AM CDT, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>Hello Joel,
>
>On Friday 22 of August 2014 17:25:24 Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> Pushed.
>>
>> Followups can just be subsequent patches.
>
>thanks, you are faster than light ...
Just truing to wrap up things on a Friday. :)
>As for the RTEMS ti
Hello Joel,
On Friday 22 of August 2014 17:25:24 Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Pushed.
>
> Followups can just be subsequent patches.
thanks, you are faster than light ...
As for the RTEMS timekeeping code, I can imagine how it could
look better. I do not like Clock_driver_nanoseconds_since_last_tick.
I
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi
>
> Some basic or1ksim BSP issues:
>
> (1) I can't build what is committed.
>
> gmake[7]: Entering directory
> `/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-testing/rtems/build-or1k-or1k_or1ksim-rtems/or1k-rtems4.11/c/or1k_or1ksim/lib/libbsp/or1
Hi
The build failures I reported were with the latest RSB tools
Please pitch in and let's resolve them.
I left a similar build going for the weekend but using the
head of gcc, newlib, and binutils. Hopefully the results
are similar.
Thanks.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Resea
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 8/22/2014 10:18 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
>> wrote:
>>> Update documentation.
>>> ---
>>> cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am| 1 -
>>> cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/
Pushed.
Followups can just be subsequent patches.
On 8/22/2014 10:20 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> The code is written as BSP specific now but it should work for all
> Cortex-A and R based CPUs and can be moved to ARM generic place in future.
>
> StackOverflow suggested sequences of writes to the regis
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
>
> FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
> for API review.
> ---
> cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h
On 8/22/2014 10:18 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
>> Update documentation.
>> ---
>> cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am| 1 -
>> cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h| 14 +--
>> cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettick
The code is written as BSP specific now but it should work for all
Cortex-A and R based CPUs and can be moved to ARM generic place in future.
StackOverflow suggested sequences of writes to the registers required
to start counters is used.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3247373/how-to-measure-
Hi
Looks like the benchmark timer code on the virtex5 is not 100%
right. It is missing a symbol.
/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-testing/rtems/build-powerpc-virtex5-rtems/powerpc-rtems4.11/c/virtex5/lib/libcpu/powerpc/../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/lib/libcpu/powerpc/mpc6xx/timer/timer.c:77:
These also would go into the clockimpl.h
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
> rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
>
> FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
> for API review.
> ---
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> Update documentation.
> ---
> cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am| 1 -
> cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h| 14 +--
> cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettickssinceboot.c | 31
> -
Hi
Another from the build. Could someone please fix this?
powerpc-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../../.././lib/
-B../../../../../.././mpc5668g/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -isystem ../../../../../.././mpc5668g/lib/include
-mcpu=8540 -meabi -msdata=sysv -fno-common -msoft-fl
Hi
More from the overnight build. Could someone fix this?
powerpc-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../.././lib/
-B../../../../.././gwlcfm/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
-DPACKAGE_NAME=\"rtems-c-src-lib-libcpu-powerpc\"
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"rtems-c-src-lib-libcpu-powerpc\"
-DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"4.10.99
Add rtems_clock_ticks_later(), rtems_clock_ticks_later_us() and
rtems_clock_ticks_later_us().
FIXME: Patch is incomplete. Documentation and tests are missing. Just
for API review.
---
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h | 66
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+
Update documentation.
---
cpukit/rtems/Makefile.am| 1 -
cpukit/rtems/include/rtems/rtems/clock.h| 14 +--
cpukit/rtems/src/clockgettickssinceboot.c | 31 -
cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/watchdog.h | 7 ++
cpukit/sc
Hi
Some basic or1ksim BSP issues:
(1) I can't build what is committed.
gmake[7]: Entering directory
`/users/joel/rtems-4.11-work/rtems-testing/rtems/build-or1k-or1k_or1ksim-rtems/or1k-rtems4.11/c/or1k_or1ksim/lib/libbsp/or1k'
Makefile:731: *** missing separator. Stop.
I think this was an issue
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
>
> On 8/22/2014 9:38 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> Looks like this function needs a guard on #if
>> defined(CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT)
>>
>>
>> see rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines()
> Or CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT ne
Looks like this function needs a guard on #if
defined(CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT)
see rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines()
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Joel Sherrill
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am guessing some conditional path isn't being covered right to
> get CPU_INSTRUCTION_C
On 8/22/2014 9:38 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Looks like this function needs a guard on #if
> defined(CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT)
>
>
> see rtems_cache_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines()
Or CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT needs to be always defined.
I did a full build of all tests on all B
Hi
Similar issue to NDS. Could someone please fix this?
../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/lib/libcpu/nios2/../shared/src/cache_manager.c:
In function '_invalidate_multiple_instruction_lines_no_range_functions':
../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/lib/libcpu/nios2/../shared/src/cache_manager.c:458:
er
Hi
I am guessing some conditional path isn't being covered right to
get CPU_INSTRUCTION_CACHE_ALIGNMENT defined. Could
someone please take a look at this and fix it?
arm-rtems4.11-gcc --pipe -B../../../../../.././lib/
-B../../../../../.././nds/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I../
Thanks.
On 8/22/2014 1:53 AM, Christian Mauderer wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I've changed the name of the structure to a more speaking one and added a few
> lines of example-code to the README of the altcycv-BSP.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Christian Mauderer
> ___
31 matches
Mail list logo