Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-08 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Stephen Shankland wrote: I've now located the blacklist file, which at present has 661 sites blacklisted, so I suspect you guys are right on that basis, too. The way it was written on Langley's blog, one could easily think they had used the method of calculation that gave a better looking perc

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-06 Thread Marsh Ray
On 10/06/2010 05:04 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote: Thanks for the information, Kurt (and indirectly, Eddy). I would like to be accurate on this point and correct the story as necessary, but I need help in ensuring I have the right information and understand what it means, first. Where did you get you

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-06 Thread Stephen Shankland
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: > > >> Google is currently communicating about how they will use SSL False Start > >> to "accelerate the web", even if it means breaking a small fraction of > >> incompatible site (they will use a black list that should mitigate most of > >> th

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-06 Thread Stephen Shankland
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Kurt Seifried wrote: >> Thanks for the information, Kurt (and indirectly, Eddy). I would like >> to be accurate on this point and correct the story as necessary, but I >> need help in ensuring I have the right information and understand what >> it means, first. > >

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-06 Thread Kurt Seifried
> Thanks for the information, Kurt (and indirectly, Eddy). I would like > to be accurate on this point and correct the story as necessary, but I > need help in ensuring I have the right information and understand what > it means, first. Where did you get you numbers exactly? > Kurt, I gather your

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-05 Thread Kurt Seifried
>> Google is currently communicating about how they will use SSL False Start >> to "accelerate the web", even if it means breaking a small fraction of >> incompatible site (they will use a black list that should mitigate most of >> the problem). >> See http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20018437-264

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-05 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 10/05/2010 03:28 PM, From Jean-Marc Desperrier: Hi, Google is currently communicating about how they will use SSL False Start to "accelerate the web", even if it means breaking a small fraction of incompatible site (they will use a black list that should mitigate most of the problem). Se

Re: Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-05 Thread Wan-Teh Chang
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Hi, > > Google is currently communicating about how they will use SSL False Start to > "accelerate the web", even if it means breaking a small fraction of > incompatible site (they will use a black list that should mitigate most of > th

Support for SSL False Start in Firefox

2010-10-05 Thread Jean-Marc Desperrier
Hi, Google is currently communicating about how they will use SSL False Start to "accelerate the web", even if it means breaking a small fraction of incompatible site (they will use a black list that should mitigate most of the problem). See http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20018437-264.html