Gervase Markham wrote:
> I am drawing this to the attention of the Mozilla cryptography community
> especially, because the document contains a section (Section 5) which
> explicitly deals with cryptographic code. So far, I haven't made any
> significant changes to it in the new draft. Does anyo
timeless wrote:
> Did Camino do this when they created, added, or enhanced their
> security UI?
Possibly not; you'd need to ask them.
> To provide a more amusing variant. Did the people who wrote help
> (Netscape, and third parties) for the Security UI in Mozilla 1.7 or
> Firefox (to the extent t
On Mar 14, 1:18 pm, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The new proposed draft is here:http://wiki.mozilla.org/Contributor_Form
>
> I am drawing this to the attention of the Mozilla cryptography community
> especially, because the document contains a section (Section 5) which
> explicitly
We are revising the Mozilla project Contributors Agreement (CVS access
agreement) to address deficiences caused by the passage of time, and the
upcoming problem that if and when we migrate away from CVS, a lot of the
document will become inappropriate. The new document is an agreement
with a le
4 matches
Mail list logo
