Gervase Markham wrote: > I am drawing this to the attention of the Mozilla cryptography community > especially, because the document contains a section (Section 5) which > explicitly deals with cryptographic code. So far, I haven't made any > significant changes to it in the new draft. Does anyone have any views > on whether that section needs revision?
A more specific question: the current language uses the term "module explicitly identified as containing cryptography" Does anyone know which modules are currently so identified? Because if there is no such list, that would need to change. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
