David Stutzman wrote:
From the PDF (CMVP = Cryptographic Module Validation Program for those
that don't know. http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/ or
http://www.csrc.nist.gov/pki/PKITesting.html):
"The CMVP allows user porting of a validated software cryptographic
module on an OS(s) and/or GPC(
Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Note that NIST already allows a crypto module vendor or user
to recompile the source code, without modification, for another
platform and *maintain the validation status*, with the caveat
that NIST makes no statement about the correct operation of
the crypto module on platfo
David Stutzman wrote:
I just read an interesting article about the FIPS certification of
OpenSSL which was brought on by the Defense Department’s Defense Medical
Logistics Standard Support program. It says that they had the source
verified instead of the binary and "Because the source code was
David Stutzman wrote:
I just noticed on the FIPS page what might be an error...
http://wiki.mozilla.org/FIPS_Validation
The HMAC row of the table has the following in the Modes column:
KeySize < BlockSize,
KeySize = BlockSize,
KeySize < BlockSize
Should one of those < be a >?
Yes, the second
I just noticed on the FIPS page what might be an error...
http://wiki.mozilla.org/FIPS_Validation
The HMAC row of the table has the following in the Modes column:
KeySize < BlockSize,
KeySize = BlockSize,
KeySize < BlockSize
Should one of those < be a >?
Let me know if there's someone/where el
I just read an interesting article about the FIPS certification of
OpenSSL which was brought on by the Defense Department’s Defense Medical
Logistics Standard Support program. It says that they had the source
verified instead of the binary and "Because the source code was
validated, it could b
6 matches
Mail list logo
