Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-17 Thread Kathleen Wilson
Many thanks to those of you who have participated in the discussions for this root inclusion request, and reviewed the information that has been provided. Certigna met the request from the first round of public discussion to post and translate the relevant portions of their CPS. During the discuss

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 03/13/2009 07:34 PM, Kathleen Wilson: Certigna met our request to post and translate the relevant portions of their CPS. There has been very little resulting discussion. Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making th

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-13 Thread Kathleen Wilson
Certigna met our request to post and translate the relevant portions of their CPS. There has been very little resulting discussion. Are there still questions that need to be addressed in this public discussion phase? Or shall I move forward with making the recommendation to approve this request? -

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-10 Thread Nelson B Bolyard
Kyle Hamilton wrote, On 2009-03-10 14:14: > I second this motion, no objections. > > -Kyle H > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Kathleen Wilson > wrote: >>> are we planning to move the discussions of accepting CAs into the root >>> list over to the other list? I think that dev-security-polic

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-10 Thread Kyle Hamilton
I second this motion, no objections. -Kyle H On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Kathleen Wilson wrote: >> are we planning to move the discussions of accepting CAs into the root >> list over to the other list?  I think that dev-security-policy is going now? > > OK.  If no one objects, I will post

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-10 Thread Kathleen Wilson
> are we planning to move the discussions of accepting CAs into the root > list over to the other list?  I think that dev-security-policy is going now? OK. If no one objects, I will post all future root inclusion request discussions on mozilla.dev.security.policy instead of dev.tech.crypto. Kath

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-10 Thread Ian G
On 10/3/09 09:22, Eddy Nigg wrote: On 03/03/2009 11:35 PM, kathleen95...@yahoo.com: Kathleen, are we planning to move the discussions of accepting CAs into the root list over to the other list? I think that dev-security-policy is going now? iang -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-cry

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-10 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 03/03/2009 11:35 PM, kathleen95...@yahoo.com: The relevant, public portion of their CPS has been attached to the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=364343 Translations of portions of this document have also been attached to the bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi

Re: Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-03 Thread Kyle Hamilton
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, wrote: > Email:  CPS section 5.2.6 specifies the controls for applications for > the Certigna ID certificates. It says that in addition to verifying > the identity of the applicant, they check the email address as follows > as per the supplied translation: > “On le

Certigna Root Inclusion Request Round 2

2009-03-03 Thread kathleen95014
Certigna has applied to add one new root CA certificate to the Mozilla root store. The first public discussion of this inclusion request can be found here: http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.tech.crypto/browse_thread/thread/1eb7ad475c762788# Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi