On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Email: CPS section 5.2.6 specifies the controls for applications for > the Certigna ID certificates. It says that in addition to verifying > the identity of the applicant, they check the email address as follows > as per the supplied translation: > “On left part of the email address, we have to found, in a non > equivoque form, the name and the first name of the future bearer. In > the opposite case, and in case of a doubt on the intention of > usurpation, it is important to report that at the security responsible > who will defined the actions to make (exhaustive check of the order, > reject or acceptation). > On the right part of the email address is located the name of the web > site of the entity or the name of a FAI (and name of another entity).”
I'll be so bold as to try to translate this into better English (this is obviously NOT to be considered authoritative): The left-hand side of the email address must contain both the first and last name of the person in order to pass the automatic issuance procedure [[NB: this is due to the word 'and' in the translation; I would assume that it should actually be an 'or', and the email address has to at least be the last name of the subscriber]]. If the left-hand side of the email address does not contain the first and[or] last name of the person, then it gets passed up the line for manual review. [[NB: the mechanism for manual review is not defined, but allows for a more exhaustive verification, automatic denial (such as '[email protected]', I presume), or immediate acceptance (under some unknown criteria).]] On the right-hand side (sitename) part of the email address must be either the name of the web site [[NB: this suggests that it must be, for example, '[email protected]' instead of '[email protected]']], or the name of a [[??What is an FAI??]] and another entity. [[NB: presumably 'gmail.com' would be the 'name of another entity', but I'm still unable to parse this sentence.]] To Certigna: I am very sorry if I have mangled the meaning of your CPS through the apparently-automated translation. > This begins phase 2 of the public discussion of the request from > Certigna to add the Certigna CA root certificate to Mozilla. Thank you, Kathleen. (And thank you, Frank, for getting Mozilla to hire her. :)) -Kyle H -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
