Re: test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Kai Engert
Falcon's message appeared broken again (signature stripped). Apparently my changes to the list configuration changes have been reverted. :( I'll have to talk to Mozilla IT. Kai -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Re: test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Falcon Darkstar Momot
On 19/05/2013 09:09, Eddy Nigg wrote: > On 05/19/2013 03:13 PM, From Kai Engert: >> On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 02:15 -0600, Falcon Darkstar Momot wrote: >>> It worked, but isn't signed. >> The message is shown as signed by evolution. >> >> I believe you experience a display bug (or rather limitation) in

Re: test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Eddy Nigg
On 05/19/2013 03:13 PM, From Kai Engert: On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 02:15 -0600, Falcon Darkstar Momot wrote: It worked, but isn't signed. The message is shown as signed by evolution. I believe you experience a display bug (or rather limitation) in Thunderbird. It showed up correctly in TB (note

Re: test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Kai Engert
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 02:15 -0600, Falcon Darkstar Momot wrote: > It worked, but isn't signed. The message is shown as signed by evolution. I believe you experience a display bug (or rather limitation) in Thunderbird. The mailing list software wraps the original message into a multipart/mixed e

Changing the recommended list archive (as Google's archive is incomplete)

2013-05-19 Thread Kai Engert
Either groups.google.com or giganews ignores (drops) messages containing a base64 encoded block of data, such as the one contained in S/MIME signed messages. We had asked to get this resolved [1], but didn't get a response, and it's still broken. Apparently the following archives correctly include

Re: test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Falcon Darkstar Momot
It worked, but isn't signed. On 19/05/2013 02:09, Kai Engert wrote: > The mailing list was configured to allow application/x-pkcs7-signature, > but it didn't allow application/pkcs7-signature. I've changed the > configuration to allow the latter, too. > > Previous messages that were signed were di

test signed message

2013-05-19 Thread Kai Engert
The mailing list was configured to allow application/x-pkcs7-signature, but it didn't allow application/pkcs7-signature. I've changed the configuration to allow the latter, too. Previous messages that were signed were displayed incorrectly by mail client evolution, which complained about a message