On 2012-04-19 17:09, David Dahl wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> [I have cross posted this message to dev-platform and dev-tech-crypto,
> perhaps we should discuss this on dev-platform as it has a larger subscriber
> base?].
>
> I am just putting together a draft feature page for an internal API needed by
- Original Message -
> From: "Kyle Hamilton"
> To: "mozilla's crypto code discussion list"
>
> Cc: "Justin Lebar"
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 7:40:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Feedback on DOMCryptInternalAPI
> >>
> >>
> >> Why is it that I get to stream data to the hash / mac provider,
- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Lebar"
> To: "David Dahl"
> Cc: dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 8:38:53 PM
> Subject: Re: Feedback on DOMCryptInternalAPI
>
> Is
>
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest
>
> a web-facing
> Apologies. This is an internal API to support the WebAPI and will be used by
> extension and browser developers.
Perhaps we're not talking about the same thing.
Is
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Privacy/Features/DOMCryptAPISpec/Latest
a web-facing API? It certainly appears to be; there are demo
- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Lebar"
> To: "David Dahl"
> Cc: dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 6:31:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Feedback on DOMCryptInternalAPI
>
> (Not cross-posting to dev-platform per Mounir's plea, and because I
> don't think these deta
[dev-tech-crypto followup]
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:11 AM, David Dahl wrote:
We could also return the hash or hmac producing object like: var h =
window.crypto.hash(alg);
This would be the most general way to handle it. (I'm told that 'generality is
the key'.)
Why is it that I get
(Not cross-posting to dev-platform per Mounir's plea, and because I
don't think these details are particularly interesting to that
audience.)
>> > interface CryptoHmac {
>>
>> Why isn't this CryptoMac? Surely the fact that it's an hmac is an
>> implementation detail.
>
> Sure, I don't imagine sup
Hello,
First, please apologize if I am not posting this message to the corrrect
mailing list. We found a problem on firefox 3.5.3 on Windows XP when using two
tokens of different brands (namely Gemalto and Oberthur) one after the other on
the same card reader, which is indeed a very special set
- Original Message -
> From: "Justin Lebar"
> To: "David Dahl"
> Cc: dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:22:31 AM
> Subject: Re: Feedback on DOMCryptInternalAPI
>
> I don't know if you're at the bikeshedding stage of this API's
> development -- if not, plea
On 2012-04-20 10:34, helpcrypto helpcrypto wrote:
> After reading your three mails, i have only one thing to say: Clear as water.
>
> Thank a lot for your patience and effort on explaining this for
> short-minded like me.
> Thanks a lot, REALLY, for your long, detailed and clear answer.
> Of cours
After reading your three mails, i have only one thing to say: Clear as water.
Thank a lot for your patience and effort on explaining this for
short-minded like me.
Thanks a lot, REALLY, for your long, detailed and clear answer.
Of course, thanks a lot to Anders (which also suffered me) and others,
I don't know if you're at the bikeshedding stage of this API's
development -- if not, please ignore me and I'll come back later. :)
> interface CryptoHmac {
Why isn't this CryptoMac? Surely the fact that it's an hmac is an
implementation detail.
It's pretty weird to me that you get
12 matches
Mail list logo
