"Livelovesearch" wrote in message
news:mailman.2662.1276398283.19335.dev-tech-cry...@lists.mozilla.org...
I have that error" Windows XP could not start because the following file
is missing or corrupt: \WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CONFIG\SYSTEM " can i fix this
from bios without Windows cd? Thx in adv
On 2010-06-13 17:56 PDT, I wrote:
> Perhaps the easiest thing to do is rerun shlibsign and compare the old
> and new files.
Please forget that I wrote that. That won't work.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
On 2010-06-13 17:24 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:08:07PM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>> On 2010-06-13 13:02 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>>> As an intermediate related question, is there a standalone
>>> verification tool for the CHK files
>>>
>>> shlibsign -V -i .
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:08:07PM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> On 2010-06-13 13:02 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:02:39AM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> >>> The root of the problem is that the shared libraries can change
> >>> POST-install, as needed for ELF sign
On 2010-06-13 13:02 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:02:39AM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>>> The root of the problem is that the shared libraries can change
>>> POST-install, as needed for ELF signing, split-debug and prelinking. The
>>> ELF signing is a catch-22. Either
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:02:39AM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> > The root of the problem is that the shared libraries can change
> > POST-install, as needed for ELF signing, split-debug and prelinking. The
> > ELF signing is a catch-22. Either I have to run shlibsign afterwards, or
> > I have
On 2010/06/13 01:33 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> LOOK at the links I provided, there are ZERO changes to the actual
> source code.
Robin, The point is that the upstream NSS team simply doesn't have time
or resources to look at every downstream distribution. There's no point
in asking us to do
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 02:11:14PM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> You have a problem with a distribution of NSS that is not identical to the
> NSS as built from the upstream NSS source repository. Mozilla's NSS team
> supports NSS as it comes from the builds from the upstream NSS source
> reposi
8 matches
Mail list logo
