On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 03:08:07PM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> On 2010-06-13 13:02 PDT, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 02:02:39AM -0700, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> >>> The root of the problem is that the shared libraries can change
> >>> POST-install, as needed for ELF signing, split-debug and prelinking. The
> >>> ELF signing is a catch-22. Either I have to run shlibsign afterwards, or
> >>> I have to not sign those files, and leave them open to potential
> >>> compromise.
> >> Rerun shlibsign.  It's fast and easy.
> > As an intermediate related question, is there a standalone verification
> > tool for the CHK files
> > 
> > shlibsign -V -i .... seems to just sign again, not verify.
> Yes.  modutil is that test tool.  You already know how to use it.
> Just drop the -force argument.
I should have clarified, that I want to verify without any disk writes,
nor assuming a pre-setup database.

# modutil -chkfips true
modutil: function failed: security library: bad database.

Just exactly that the chk files are valid, and nothing else.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead
E-Mail     : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
-- 
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to