On 17/1/09 16:19, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 01/17/2009 11:45 AM, Ian G:
It's also irresponsible and unprofessional, and likely if we want to
make this distinction, we will have to think about a policy of no
complaints. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
Well, no...somebody is free to complain
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
> Michael Ströder a écrit :
>> I think that the attitude of not bothering
>> the end user with technical details is the wrong direction because
>> people with technical knowledge need the details to help the end user.
>> Especially since there's not always face-to-face s
On 01/17/2009 11:45 AM, Ian G:
Once you name another party, then you are likely in dispute.
Might be.
...then that should be treated a
dispute.
The question is, if Mozilla is a party to that dispute. Making a
complaint about a CA might be of interest for Mozilla (in its own
right), but Mo
On 16/1/09 17:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 6:05 AM + 1/16/09, Gervase Markham wrote:
Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
3. I wonder if the non-developer topics are already within the scope of
another extant low-traffic list, namely dev-security (a.k.a.
mozilla.dev.security), except that I think the new
On 17/1/09 01:03, Eddy Nigg wrote:
On 01/16/2009 06:16 PM, Ian G:
What is the difference? A complaint is a dispute as far as I can see.
Dispute:
"A controversy or dispute occurs when parties actively disagree, argue
about, or debate, a matter of opinion. Controversies can range in size
from
5 matches
Mail list logo
