On 10/10/2008 01:48 AM, Ian G:
>
> Wl whatever it is, you'd like it; read on.
>
Actually I did :-)
>
> IN CONSIDERATION OF YOUR AGREEMENT TO THESE TERMS, YOU ARE ENTITLED
> TO USE VERISIGN INFORMATION AS SET FORTH HEREIN.
>
> https://www.verisign.com/repository/rpa.html
>
> Now, curi
Eddy Nigg wrote:
> On 10/09/2008 05:33 PM, Ian G:
>> The goals of Mozo are written somewhere else, and they only speak
>> softly to the issue of security from memory
>
> I obviously meant the goals of the Mozilla CA Policy and NSS, which
> isn't used only by Mozilla (Firefox) but lots of differen
On 10/09/2008 05:33 PM, Ian G:
>
> The goals of Mozo are written somewhere else, and they only speak
> softly to the issue of security from memory
I obviously meant the goals of the Mozilla CA Policy and NSS, which
isn't used only by Mozilla (Firefox) but lots of different software. NSS
is a cry
2008/10/9 Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Why is there DSA key generation but not RSA key generation? e.g.,
> page 10, pt 23.
This is because CMVP doesn't test RSA key generation. On the
RSA validation list at
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cavp/documents/dss/rsaval.html
you can see that only Si
2008/10/9 Ian G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Stutzman wrote:
>> The security policy in case anyone is interested and doesn't have it:
>> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/secpolicy.pdf
>
> Thanks Dave,
>
> I'm interested, and flicked through, but most of it is way above my
> pay
> A plain text version would be extremely helpful. Concerning machine
> translation, I think I'll be alright ;-)
I have attached a plain text version to Bug 370505, it is available
here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=342436
I still don't think a machine translation will be of any
Eddy Nigg wrote:
> On 10/02/2008 10:23 PM, Frank Hecker:
> >
> > Our goal here is to avoid having to evaluate lots and lots of
> > subordinate CAs, and instead have the roots take care of their own
> > subordinates and ensure they're compliant to policy.
> >
>
> I'd like to pick this discussi
On 10/02/2008 10:23 PM, Frank Hecker:
>
> Our goal here is to avoid having to evaluate lots and lots of
> subordinate CAs, and instead have the roots take care of their own
> subordinates and ensure they're compliant to policy.
>
I'd like to pick this discussion up once again and evaluate wha
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:06:55PM -0700, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Eddy Nigg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I've been banging my head against a wall here because of this FUD and
> > about misinformation which is absolutely incorrect. Sad, because there
> > are man
David Stutzman wrote:
> The security policy in case anyone is interested and doesn't have it:
> http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/secpolicy.pdf
Thanks Dave,
I'm interested, and flicked through, but most of it is way above my
pay grade. It looks like a huge investment put into
The security policy in case anyone is interested and doesn't have it:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/fips/secpolicy.pdf
Dave
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.
11 matches
Mail list logo
