>My ultimate goal is to implement W3C spec for XML based
>Key Management using Mozilla only code base.
Whow! Now we are two! I see the process like this:
1. Develop a system that people hopefully like and start to use
2. Then make it a standard
I started the other way around but with 5 years w
Hi Nelson,
No, it does not work on Seamonkey.
An old "contents.rdf" file (which I forgot to remove) also messes up the
browser's menu.
I should have tested it on Mozilla - sorry about that.
--
Subrata
Nelson Bolyard wrote:
> Subrata Mazumdar wrote:
>
>> Here is a follow-up to the original
>Kyle wrote:
>Not XER?
You mean http://asf.gils.net/xer/ ?
Although XER would be possible, I intend to build this on the same
ground as WASP (http://webpki.org/WASP-tutorial.pdf ) and WebAuth
("TLS client-authentication killer") in order to create a "family" of matched
PKI-related browser subsys
Hi Anders,
Please take look at the following extension at (s:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4522
I have mentioned this extension in response to your comments on my
KeyManager extension.
It my first effort in supporting XML based security protocols - XML
based signature process
Anders,
I agree with you totally. That is why I have another extension
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4522) for XML digital
signature processing to support the all those on-line stuff. You would
still need the PKI based key generation stuff to support XML based
signature and en
I am releasing the extension under Mozilla license, same license under
which I got Mozilla source code.
I have submitted the modified version ( 0.0.2.20070330) under Mozilla
license yesterday.
Only reason I did not package the source with binary is that it would
increase the size of the XPI fi
6 matches
Mail list logo
