Kaspar,
Thanks for your reply. It was much better than the one I wrote (but also
didn't send :).
I wrote a long reply about how mozilla products don't use Microsoft's
proprietary crypto APIs and CSPs, but rather use the open PKCS#11
standard API for cryptographic modules, which runs on just abou
Gervase Markham wrote:
> I am drawing this to the attention of the Mozilla cryptography community
> especially, because the document contains a section (Section 5) which
> explicitly deals with cryptographic code. So far, I haven't made any
> significant changes to it in the new draft. Does anyo
On 3/22/07, Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>
> > The only function that limiting the types of things that a root can
> > sign certificates for is to raise the bar and force people who want to
> > do certain things (like sign code) to get identity certificates fro
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> See, identity is identity.
I don't agree.
"This site's identity is www.example.com" is a different sort of
identity to "This site is owned and operated by Foo Corp. of Bermuda",
which is again different to "This site is owned and operated by Gervase
Markham, of Enfield,
Hello all,
Im doing a Java implementation that uses its own wrapper to access pkcs11
modules. With this library, I'm trying to list user certificates inside of
softokn3 nss's pkcs11 software module. For achieving this, I'm passing to
pkcs#11 Initialize function the next args:
"c
5 matches
Mail list logo
