Re: [dev-servo] Crazy idea: CSS selector JITting at parse time

2014-03-31 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
lla.org/listinfo/dev-servo -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla ___ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo

Re: [dev-servo] Per-document event queues

2015-07-23 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
do better. Specifically, I'm interested in moving > to isolated event queues per document, then doing round-robin event > processing on each on in an eTLD group. That would make the script event > loop look something like this: -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, M

[dev-servo] Weird build error

2015-12-06 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
I just attempted to build Servo on a new computer, only to end with the following output: $ ./mach bootstrap Running virtualenv with interpreter /opt/local/bin/python2.7 New python executable in /Users/david/Documents/Code/servo/python/_virtualenv/bin/python Installing setuptools, pip, wheel...don

[dev-servo] MozLando: Telemetry for Servo. Today at 11h10

2015-12-10 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
I'll give a quick (unscheduled) talk about Telemetry for Servo today at 11h10 in Northern E4. Cheers, David ___ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo

Re: [dev-servo] Suggested code review workflow

2016-02-03 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
Very good point. In Gecko-land, some teams use multi-line commit messages as documentation and my experience shows that it's very useful. Cheers, David On 03/02/16 20:21, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 2/3/16 1:46 PM, Josh Matthews wrote: >> Nikki asked for suggestions for how to review code, so here

Re: [dev-servo] Fwd: Re: Suggested code review workflow

2016-02-23 Thread David Rajchenbach-Teller
In Gecko, I have taken the habit of requesting long messages when the patch is not self-contained. Plus, I am currently working on bugs that would have been much easier to puzzle out if we (well, if I) had explained in the long message why some changes were made. In other words, +1 for requesting