On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/25/13 2:33 PM, David Bruant wrote:
>> 2) different-origin iframe. JS from the parent can only interact with it
>> through message passing via postMessage.
>
> Note that whether an iframe is same-origin or not is not time-invariant
> acro
How does this relate to the async animations we are already performing on the
compositor thread today? Isn't that sufficient for most animations people want?
(transform, opacity).
Andreas
On Oct 13, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Patrick Walton wrote:
> This did make me realize something, however: If the
Proof-carrying code and type preserving compilation allow securing even fairly
complex compiler optimizations to be done securely. Sprinkle process
separation/isolation and lowered rights onto that and I don’t think fast JS has
to be a significant security risk.
Thanks,
Andreas
> On Nov 11,
Does anyone have profiling numbers that Azure on top of Skia has a measurable
performance overhead?
Thanks,
Andreas
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Cameron Zwarich wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Patrick Walton wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/14 1:02 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>>> https://gi
We should experiment with parallel software rendering. Using skia on many cores
might be faster than using D2D in practice, for example. Andreas
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote:
>
>> Incidentally, I see no reason to move away from Azure, given how nice
>> Direct2D is on Windo
There are easier ways to compare. D2D is something like 40% faster than
software (Bas, is that the right ballpark?). So if you get a 2x+ speedup with
concurrent software rendering, you win.
Thanks,
Andreas
> On Nov 12, 2014, at 12:08 PM, Jack Moffitt wrote:
>
>>> We should experiment with p
he direction the industry is going in with APIs like Mantle, DX12,
> Metal, etc.
>
> Cameron
>
>> On Nov 12, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Andreas Gal wrote:
>>
>> There are easier ways to compare. D2D is something like 40% faster than
>> software (Bas, is that the righ
7 matches
Mail list logo
