On 08/09/16 16:08, Lars Bergstrom wrote:
> That said, I know that there are a few benefits on the mingw side:
(4) Build Servo on Windows using only free software?
(Or is that not true?)
Gerv
___
dev-servo mailing list
dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org
ht
On 26/08/16 15:11, Brian Anderson wrote:
> There are many benefits to this approach. Advancing Rust crypto is
> perennially a high-priority strategic nice-to-have in Rust, but so far we
> have not been able to find the right motivation to put weight behind it.
> Any time there is a glimmer of oppor
On 25/02/16 18:43, Josh Matthews wrote:
> Hi Radu! Sorry for the delay in proposing anything; unfortunately we've
> been coming up with a lot of projects for students recently
> * implementing revalidation of cached responses that may not be up to date
> * evicting stale cache entries
http
On 18/08/15 01:36, Lars Bergstrom wrote:
> https://github.com/servo/servo/wiki/Meeting-2015-08-17
About the UA: if you find sites break because you are sending a UA and
it sniffs you badly (e.g. sites using Enyo.js), I suggest _not_ trying
to tweak the UA to make every site work. That way lies mad
On 20/01/15 19:33, Kyle Huey wrote:
> Unfortunately removing the referrer header is generally not compatible with
> the web.
However, do see Brian Smith's recent proposal on this topic:
https://briansmith.org/referrer-01.html
Gerv
___
dev-servo mailing
On 21/12/14 17:42, Prasoon Shukla wrote:
> I'm writing this to enquire whether servo would accept student
> projects as a part of GSoC 2015 (which has already been announced)
> and if so, how many (1 or 2? More?).
I can answer part of your question: Mozilla intends to apply as an org
for GSoC 2015
On 08/07/14 02:53, Jack Moffitt wrote:
> this was about a much lower memory device. It's not clear it's even
> possible, but the question was whether we could ever fit in 32MB.
> There is significant interest internally and externally in low memory
> deployment.
How much, in volume, does 128MB of
On 02/09/13 16:24, L. David Baron wrote:
> Agreed. But that does really mean assessing options again later
> (when we want authors to start caring about Servo).
Someone can file a bug when that time comes, and we can have the joy of
discussing it then :-)
Gerv
__
On 01/09/13 16:41, Tom Schuster wrote:
> I thought the Mozilla/5.0 and like Gecko part are required by the web?
Turns out testing shows that Mozilla/5.0 is hardly required at all -
removing it makes very little difference.
Of course, you have to consider the PR angle of Mozilla shipping a
browser
On 02/05/13 00:53, Brian Anderson wrote:
> No, it is not ready for any real-world purpose, though it is a good
> project for learning Rust on. The most complicated page that Servo can
> render currently is about:mozilla, and that incorrectly.
Not to diss Servo, but I'd be surprised if you render i
10 matches
Mail list logo
