Re: [dev-servo] Dropping CEF support?

2018-01-29 Thread Paul Rouget
> What does "3rd party project" mean in this case? It's not clear to me how you > could do a CEF wrapper externally without forking and removing glutin > entirely. Why do we need glutin for CEF? If I'm not mistaken, the only part of glutin that is useful in this case is creating the GL buffer, r

Re: [dev-servo] Dropping CEF support?

2018-01-29 Thread Lars Bergstrom
What does "3rd party project" mean in this case? It's not clear to me how you could do a CEF wrapper externally without forking and removing glutin entirely. At a higher level, I guess I'm concerned that CEF is the only vehicle we currently have for testing Servo within a full-featured browser she

Re: [dev-servo] Dropping CEF support?

2018-01-29 Thread Paul Rouget
https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/19900 On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 1:27 AM, Patrick Walton wrote: > Let's get rid of it. > > Patrick > > On Jan 29, 2018 4:22 PM, "Paul Rouget" wrote: >> >> AFAIK the CEF port is not used by anyone, is not maintained, and is >> not tested. I'm not even sure it work

Re: [dev-servo] Dropping CEF support?

2018-01-29 Thread Patrick Walton
Let's get rid of it. Patrick On Jan 29, 2018 4:22 PM, "Paul Rouget" wrote: > AFAIK the CEF port is not used by anyone, is not maintained, and is > not tested. I'm not even sure it works. > > I believe the CEF port should be a 3rd party project, and it should > not rely on Glutin. > > Dropping C

[dev-servo] Dropping CEF support?

2018-01-29 Thread Paul Rouget
AFAIK the CEF port is not used by anyone, is not maintained, and is not tested. I'm not even sure it works. I believe the CEF port should be a 3rd party project, and it should not rely on Glutin. Dropping CEF would help me with my work on unforking Glutin. Any reason to keep CEF? ___