On 10/09/14 19:32, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:44 PM, James Graham wrote:
>> Yes, I agree too. One option I had considered was making a suite
>> "web-platform-tests-mozilla" for things that we can't push upstream e.g.
>> because the APIs aren't (yet) undergoing meaningful standa
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:44 PM, James Graham wrote:
> Yes, I agree too. One option I had considered was making a suite
> "web-platform-tests-mozilla" for things that we can't push upstream e.g.
> because the APIs aren't (yet) undergoing meaningful standardisation.
> Putting the editing tests into
On 2014-09-09, 8:44 AM, James Graham wrote:
On 08/09/14 19:42, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I think unreviewed tests should still be run by browsers' automated
testing framework (obviously unless they take too long, are
unreliable, etc.). They just shouldn't be counted toward any claims
of conformance.
On 08/09/14 19:42, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>> I think unreviewed tests should still be run by browsers' automated
>> testing framework (obviously unless they take too long, are
>> unreliable, etc.). They just shouldn't be counted toward any claims
>> of conformance. Even if the expected values are e
On 2014-09-08, 6:47 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:49 PM, James Graham wrote:
Well, it would also make sense to have interop for editing of course :)
Not a single major browser has significant resources invested in
working on their editing code. Until that changes, nothing
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 5:49 PM, James Graham wrote:
> Well, it would also make sense to have interop for editing of course :)
Not a single major browser has significant resources invested in
working on their editing code. Until that changes, nothing much is
going to happen.
> I would certainly
On 9/7/14, 10:21 AM, James Graham wrote:
There isn't anything at the moment, but it seems like a good idea to
invent something. The easiest thing would be a new key-value pair like
expected-reason: Some reason string
Do you have a preferred syntax here?
Nope. Pretty much anything works for m
On 07/09/14 12:34, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, James Graham wrote:
>> I think Ms2ger has a better answer here, but I believe it obsoletes most
>> of them, except a few that never got submitted to web-platform-tests
>> (the editing tests are in that class, because the spec
On 06/09/14 05:05, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 9/5/14, 11:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
>> Instructions for performing the updates are in the README file
>> [2]. There is tooling available to help in the update process.
>
> Is there a way to document the spec or test suite bugs in the
> expectations fi
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, James Graham wrote:
> I think Ms2ger has a better answer here, but I believe it obsoletes most
> of them, except a few that never got submitted to web-platform-tests
> (the editing tests are in that class, because the spec effort sort of died).
FWIW, the editing te
On 9/5/14, 11:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
Instructions for performing the updates are in the README file
[2]. There is tooling available to help in the update process.
Is there a way to document the spec or test suite bugs in the
expectations file? e.g. if I want to add an "expected: FAIL" and
On 05/09/14 18:00, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 9/5/14, 11:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
>> The web-platform-tests testsuite has just landed on
>> Mozilla-Central.
>
> This is fantastic. Thank you!
>
> Does this obsolete our existing "imptests" tests, or is this a set of
> tests disjoint from those?
On 9/5/14, 11:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
The web-platform-tests testsuite has just landed on
Mozilla-Central.
This is fantastic. Thank you!
Does this obsolete our existing "imptests" tests, or is this a set of
tests disjoint from those?
-Boris
__
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 8:55 AM, James Graham wrote:
> The web-platform-tests testsuite has just landed on
> Mozilla-Central. It is an import of a testsuite collated by the W3C
> [1], which we intend to keep up-to-date with upstream. The tests are
> located in /testing/web-platform/tests/ and are n
14 matches
Mail list logo
