On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 3:44 PM, James Graham <ja...@hoppipolla.co.uk> wrote: > Yes, I agree too. One option I had considered was making a suite > "web-platform-tests-mozilla" for things that we can't push upstream e.g. > because the APIs aren't (yet) undergoing meaningful standardisation. > Putting the editing tests into this bucket might make some sense.
That definitely sounds like a great idea, but I think it would be even better if upstream had a place for these tests, so we could share them with other engines (and hopefully they would reciprocate). Anyone who's just interested in conformance test figures would be free not to run these extra tests, of course. I don't see why upstream would mind hosting these tests. In the longer term, I think it would be very interesting if all simple mochitests were written in a shareable format, and if other engines did similarly. I imagine we'd find lots of interesting regressions if we ran a large chunk of WebKit/Blink tests as part of our regular test suite, even if many of the tests will expect the wrong results from our perspective. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
