Re: IDL vs ifdef

2017-07-24 Thread Joshua Cranmer 🐧
On 7/24/2017 7:08 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: I also don't want the dom-related part in tbird. I'm also going to make sure that it even never executes any jscript stuff from mails. That was done almost a decade ago. Much to the consternation of the few users who wanted an optio

Re: IDL vs ifdef

2017-07-24 Thread Steve Fink
On 07/24/2017 05:08 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: On 24.07.2017 21:03, Ralph Giles wrote: I suspect this will be painful to maintain. We used to have a lot of #ifdefs for media playback support but they weren't tested and were usually broken, so we removed them. Well, I'm just r

Re: IDL vs ifdef

2017-07-24 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 24.07.2017 21:03, Ralph Giles wrote: I suspect this will be painful to maintain. We used to have a lot of #ifdefs for media playback support but they weren't tested and were usually broken, so we removed them. Well, I'm just reintroducing them. My original intention was just to build w/o t

Re: IDL vs ifdef

2017-07-24 Thread Ralph Giles
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult < enrico.weig...@gr13.net> wrote: > I'm currently in process of making the media stuff optional. > (dont need/want it within mail client). > I suspect this will be painful to maintain. We used to have a lot of #ifdefs for media p