On 2014-01-07 6:39 AM, matteosistise...@gmail.com wrote:
On https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641509 in the
comments I can't see any valid argument that backs up the decision to
not fix the issue. At least none that would stand to the objection
which I posted as a comment:
Having a s
On 1/7/2014, 11:40 AM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Oh now I see, 'the *confusion* of the "OMG YOUR COMPUTER IS
INFECTED BY A VIRUS" messages were causing', that's the point! LOL
Yeah, I think we're done here.
- mhoye
___
dev-platform mailin
On 07/01/14 13:02, Till Schneidereit wrote:
The discussion has happened in bug 588292[1]. For a succinct summary,
see tha bug's comment 37[2].
No, that doesn't respond to my point.
I did read the discussion in the bug I commented on (not the other one I
admit) and the "security reasons" argume
My point is that your arguments have been brought forward in the
discussion, and your post didn't bring anything new to the table. You might
disagree with the decision the contributors and owners of the affected
module have come to, and that's your right.
Snide remarks and shooting down exaggerate
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:39 AM, wrote:
> Can anybody explain not only to me but also to the number of people who
> questioned the same, why the decision to not fix the issue is a good idea?
> (despite by the way every other browser supporting that, except Opera which
> does not support the on
The discussion has happened in bug 588292[1]. For a succinct summary, see
tha bug's comment 37[2]. For the reasoning behind restricting comments, see
that bug's comment 116[3]
In general, it's very unlikely that a basic point as the one you made
wasn't considered in a discussion spanning 230 comme
On https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641509 in the comments I can't
see any valid argument that backs up the decision to not fix the issue.
At least none that would stand to the objection which I posted as a comment:
> Having a standard message always displayed is ok,
> but what's the
7 matches
Mail list logo
