On https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641509 in the comments I can't see any valid argument that backs up the decision to not fix the issue. At least none that would stand to the objection which I posted as a comment:
> Having a standard message always displayed is ok, > but what's the reasoning behind not allowing to _add_ a custom text?!?!?!? In "reply" to my comment the issue was closed to comments. Instead of that, could anybody reply with a reasonable argument and prove my "reasoning" wrong? (I put "reasoning" between quotes because I find it almost too elementary and obvious to be even called a "reasoning") Can anybody explain not only to me but also to the number of people who questioned the same, why the decision to not fix the issue is a good idea? (despite by the way every other browser supporting that, except Opera which does not support the onbeforeunload event in the first place) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
