Re: Intent to enable as default paragraph separator of contenteditable/designMode editor by default

2018-02-14 Thread Jet Villegas
SGTM. Please follow up to make sure this workaround makes it on to MDN: > document.execCommand("defaultParagraphSeparator", false, "br"); Thx! On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:14 PM, Masayuki Nakano wrote: > Starting from Firefox 60, I'd like to enable as default paragraph > separator of contentedi

Intent to unship: Legacy -moz-transform syntax.

2018-02-14 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hi, In bug 1438297 I intend to remove the legacy syntax for -moz-transform, which allows lengths or percentages apart from numbers in some transform matrix components. That will make -moz-transform a normal alias for the "transform" property, just like -webkit-transform, following the usual

Re: Intent to unship: -moz-user-input: disabled / enabled

2018-02-14 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
On 02/14/2018 06:00 PM, L. David Baron wrote: On Wednesday 2018-02-14 09:25 +0100, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: Hi, In bug 1405087 I intend to remove the "enabled" and "disabled" values of the -moz-user-input property. Do other browser engines implement the 'user-input' property (prefixed or u

Re: Intent to unship: -moz-user-input: disabled / enabled

2018-02-14 Thread L. David Baron
On Wednesday 2018-02-14 09:25 +0100, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > Hi, > > In bug 1405087 I intend to remove the "enabled" and "disabled" values of the > -moz-user-input property. Do other browser engines implement the 'user-input' property (prefixed or unprefixed)? Which values do they support?

Re: Intent to ship: Module scripts (ES6 modules)

2018-02-14 Thread Josh Bowman-Matthews
On 2/14/18 9:58 AM, James Graham wrote: On 14/02/2018 14:13, jcoppe...@mozilla.com wrote: I intend to turn on

Re: Intent to ship: Module scripts (ES6 modules)

2018-02-14 Thread jcoppeard
On Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 2:59:33 PM UTC, James Graham wrote: > Are there web-platform-tests for this feature? Yes, under: html/semantics/scripting-1/the-script-element/module/ Jon ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org ht

Re: Intent to ship: Module scripts (ES6 modules)

2018-02-14 Thread James Graham
On 14/02/2018 14:13, jcoppe...@mozilla.com wrote: I intend to turn on

Intent to ship: Module scripts (ES6 modules)

2018-02-14 Thread jcoppeard
I intend to turn on

Re: Improved wpt-sync now running experimentally

2018-02-14 Thread James Graham
On 12/02/2018 20:08, smaug wrote: On 02/09/2018 10:39 PM, James Graham wrote: On 09/02/2018 19:59, Josh Bowman-Matthews wrote: On 2/9/18 1:26 PM, James Graham wrote: * One bug per PR we downstream, filed in a component determined by the files changed in the PR. What does this mean exactly? W

Re: How to pass data from to a content process when it starts up?

2018-02-14 Thread bowen
Perhaps we should also change the various GeckoChildProcessHost Launch methods to accept LaunchOptions or a similar structure instead of aExtraOpts. On Wednesday, 14 February 2018 09:23:05 UTC, bo...@mozilla.com wrote: > Hi Nick, > > SandboxBroker::AddHandleToShare was added to add the handles

Re: How to pass data from to a content process when it starts up?

2018-02-14 Thread bowen
Hi Nick, SandboxBroker::AddHandleToShare was added to add the handles to the sandbox policy, before it was realised that we'd need to do this for the non-sandboxed process launch as well, hence LaunchOptions::handles_to_inherit. I think we should change [1] to pass the LaunchOptions and then us

Intent to unship: -moz-user-input: disabled / enabled

2018-02-14 Thread Emilio Cobos Álvarez
Hi, In bug 1405087 I intend to remove the "enabled" and "disabled" values of the -moz-user-input property. The reasoning for this is because they're slightly broken in presence of dynamic changes (see the bug), and their usage seems low / web-compat risk seems not too high. In particular,