On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I've also had cinnabar fail badly at various times, and then it's been
> pretty unclear what
> the service level guarantees for that were.
>
>
time to try again maybe?
I use git with cinnabar on windows, linux and mac, and I haven't had any
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>
>> > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's
>> decision
>> > a while ago to pick a VCS w
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's
> decision
> > a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be the dominant
> > choice (not placing bl
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Andrew McCreight
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
> > Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's
> decision
> > a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be the dominant
> > choice (not placing bl
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Generally no, but this is an unfortunate consequence of Mozilla's decision
> a while ago to pick a VCS which has not turned out to be the dominant
> choice (not placing blame here, but I think it's clear that's how it's
> turned out). The re
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Aki Sasaki wrote:
> On 9/16/17 6:43 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>
>> 2. There are a lot more people writing code for Firefox than developing
>> the
>> internal tools, so in general, costs on those people should be avoided.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Eri
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> On 09/18/2017 03:30 PM, Bobby Holley wrote:
>>
>> CVS history feels like an odd bar for cinnabar. The goal of cinnabar is to
>> enable seamless integration between git and mercurial with reproducible, 1:1
>> commit mappings. Our canonical mer
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
>
> I've tried using cinnabar a couple of times now and the last time I
> tried, this was the dealbreaker for me. My worfklow often involves
> moving a branch from one machine to another and the extra hassle that
> results from mismatched SH
On 09/09/2017 12:12 PM, Mats Palmgren wrote:
On 8/31/17 6:50 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 08/30/2017 09:03 PM, Eric Rahm wrote:
Okay sounds like there's agreement on a).
Indeed. I have edited the Style Guide to reflect this.
Fwiw, I disagree with this decision.
Here's a more realistic exam
On 09/11/2017 06:46 PM, Eric Rahm wrote:
Thanks everyone!
This got a bit derailed but it's clear that a unified style for binary
operators is desired.
I received several emails off-list in support of my original proposal,
a few people reiterated their preference for operators on the newline
10 matches
Mail list logo
