Hi all,
There are two things in the platform that need a developer, which would
significantly help Firefox OS L10n/Intl work.
1) Move navigator.mozHour12 to platform
This is a shim [0] that currently requires us to give all apps that want to
properly display time to elevate its privileges to h
Reported: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/77
zb.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
I think that would fail as well, because the let would be shadowing the
global x, which isn't allowed.
On Sep 18, 2015 2:25 PM, "Neil" wrote:
> Shu-yu Guo wrote:
>
> Good catch and thanks for the correction! The take-home from the example is
>> that: due to the global lexical scope, a TDZ error c
On 17/09/15 19:59, Shu-yu Guo wrote:
> Because until now, our global 'let' semantics have been identical to
> those of 'var', I have already landed a patch that mass replaces global
> 'let' with 'var' as part of bug 1202902.
I think someone should make you a "var is the new let" t-shirt...
Gerv
>On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
>
>> That bug does not seem to support the claim that they intend to ship
>> this feature. No intent-to-ship is mentioned, and it appears the
>> intent-to-implement has not been sent.
>>
>
>Here's evidence they intend to implement:
>https://docs.goog
Shu-yu Guo wrote:
Good catch and thanks for the correction! The take-home from the example is
that: due to the global lexical scope, a TDZ error could arise later due to
newly introduced bindings.
So for that I guess the code would have to look like this?
var x;
function f() { dump(x); }
f()
On 09/18/2015 06:30 AM, Zibi Braniecki wrote:
Hi,
One of the major use cases for MutationObserver is all kinds of libraries that
either shim APIs or provide intrinsic modifications to DOM experience.
Examples of such libraries may be:
* A library that provides Date/Time pickers only caring ab
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
> That bug does not seem to support the claim that they intend to ship
> this feature. No intent-to-ship is mentioned, and it appears the
> intent-to-implement has not been sent.
>
Here's evidence they intend to implement:
https://docs.google.com/do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
On 09/18/2015 04:39 AM, Andreas Pehrson wrote:
> Other UAs intending to ship it are at least Chromium/Blink, who
> have started work in this bug:
> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=524218.
>
That bug does not seem to
9 matches
Mail list logo
