Re: Telemetry Dashboards

On 2015-08-19 1:59 PM, azha...@gmail.com wrote: Evolution dashboard: Enumerated histograms. Boolean histograms. Histogram dashboard: Keyed histograms. Thanks Anthony! I've been looking forward to reports like these for a long time. Matthew N. (:MattN) ___

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

On 2015-08-19 2:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: (We should probably rename that to "Accept third-part[y] cookies and data:".) Should we? I was kind of hoping we could maintain the illusion that all storage is cookies since it would keep t

Re: Intent to Ship: Updated third-party iframe storage behavior

On 2015-08-18 7:47 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: On 2015-08-18 5:37 PM, Tanvi Vyas wrote: It is nice to see that we are moving towards an "Accept third party cookies and data" setting instead of just "Allow third party cookies". Will localstorag

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Bobby Holley >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> >> >> >> Does MozPromise have the same "skipping the event loop" behav

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Bobby Holley > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > >> > >> Does MozPromise have the same "skipping the event loop" behavior that > >> JS promises have? > > > > > > They do not. > > >

Re: recording use counters for web features

On 2015-08-19 11:35 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: Bug 968923, "Implement some equivalent of Chrome's use counters", has landed on mozilla-central. Hurray! \o/ - WebIDL method - WebIDL attribute (getters and setters reported separately) - CSS property - operation listed in dom/base/nsDeprecatedOper

Re: Selectors to Standardize

On 2015-08-19 4:33 PM, fantasai wrote: (A) So far we already have on the standards track :-moz-only-whitespace as :blank http://www.w3.org/TR/selectors4/#the-blank-pseudo **Please, if you all have better name suggestions, we welcome them.** [ :blank imho sounds like a blank for

Re: recording use counters for web features

On 8/19/15 11:35 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: These statistics are reported through Telemetry. Have the in-tree docs been updated to document this? I don't recall being asked to review the final data collection proposal for this mechanism. In particular: * Will this only collect to the opt-in (pre

Re: Selectors to Standardize

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:33 AM, fantasai wrote: > > :-moz-full-screen > :-moz-full-screen-ancestor :-moz-full-screen has been standardized as :fullscreen in Fullscreen API Standard [1], and that spec also introduces a new pseudo-element ::backdrop which has been implemented in Blink and Trid

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: >> >> Does MozPromise have the same "skipping the event loop" behavior that >> JS promises have? > > > They do not. > >> >> Or is that limited just to StateMirroring? > > > Correct, as well as

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > Does MozPromise have the same "skipping the event loop" behavior that > JS promises have? They do not. > Or is that limited just to StateMirroring? > Correct, as well as StateWatching. StateMirroring uses StableState to dispatch the atomic

Telemetry Dashboards

Hello: Telemetry dashboards received quite a few updates, and now needs some testing and feedback! These areas in particular have had significant changes: Evolution dashboard: Enumerated histograms. Boolean histograms. Switching betwee

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > I gave a lightning talk at Whistler about MozPromise and a few other new > tools to facilitate asynchronous and parallel programming in Gecko. There > was significant interest, and so I spent some time over the past few weeks > untangling them

Selectors to Standardize

So after a nearly 2 year hiatus, I'm back to editing the Selectors 4 spec... I'm looking over the set of -moz- selectors http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/layout/style/nsCSSPseudoClassList.h and wondering which ones we need to put on the standards track. (A) So far we already have

Re: recording use counters for web features

This is awesome - thanks Nathan! On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > Bug 968923, "Implement some equivalent of Chrome's use counters", has > landed on mozilla-central. We are now able to report statistics on whether > individual documents use a given: > > - WebIDL method > -

recording use counters for web features

Bug 968923, "Implement some equivalent of Chrome's use counters", has landed on mozilla-central. We are now able to report statistics on whether individual documents use a given: - WebIDL method - WebIDL attribute (getters and setters reported separately) - CSS property - operation listed in dom/

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

We have a static analysis for this right now: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/clang-plugin/tests/TestNoRefcountedInsideLambdas.cpp And there is potential for more static analyses if we decide that we need them. We also have bug 1157788 if we decide at some point that we w

Re: New policy: 48-hour backouts for major Talos regressions

This is a great point, and I still have no idea what caused the linux 32/64 machines to change on July 30th. It appeared to be a gradual rollout (indicates a machine issue which was picked up on reboot or something similar). For running talos tests we pin to a specific revision in the talos repos

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

Hi bholley, looks great, but a question The example mProducer->RequestFoo() ->Then(mThread, __func__, [...] (ResolveType aVal) { ... }, [...] (RejectType aVal) { ... }); uses C++ lambdas. Do we have some static analysis or such in place to protect that

Re: MozPromises are now in XPCOM

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015, at 11:17 PM, Bobby Holley wrote: > I gave a lightning talk at Whistler about MozPromise and a few other new > tools to facilitate asynchronous and parallel programming in Gecko. There > was significant interest, and so I spent some time over the past few > weeks > untangling t

Re: Proposed W3C Charters: Web Platform and Timed Media Working Groups

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:59 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing revised charters for: > > Web Platform Working Group: > http://www.w3.org/2015/07/web-platform-wg.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2015Jul/0020.html This charter doesn't mention the WHATW

Re: Intent to Implement: Selection Events

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Michael Layzell wrote: > Summary: We currently require webpages to poll the current selection when > they want to be > notified of changes to the user's selection.This patch adds two events, > selectstart and > selectionchange, which allow the website to detect wh

Re: Decreasing quality?

I fondly remember the days when Nightly was sporting golden tabs on OSX; it’s part of the joy running the cutting edge! Cheers, Mike. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Re: Decreasing quality?

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Gavin Sharp wrote: > It's possible this bug was being confused with bug 1195030. > That seems likely, yes. Being responsible for this particular regression, I can say that neither is it at all related to the other bugs mentioned, nor can it reasonably be interpre