Intent to remove SpecialPowers from Marionette

2015-05-08 Thread Jonathan Griffin
We are removing SpecialPowers from Marionette, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1149618. This means Marionette tests will no longer be able to use SpecialPowers to gain access to a privileged context. As part of this effort, I'm adapting all Marionette tests in mozilla-central and

Xcode project generation, feedback requested

2015-05-08 Thread gkeeley
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063329 If anyone is using Xcode for Gecko development could you try the patches in the bug above and add feedback? Run with: mach build-backend -b xcode It should compile (but not link) and provide the usual IDE editing features: - full navigation:

Re: Proposal to alter the coding style to not require the usage of 'virtual' where 'override' is used

2015-05-08 Thread Daniel Holbert
On 05/07/2015 02:53 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > The warning that you are proposing to fix here is > -Woverloaded-virtual. [EDIT: karl meant to say > -Winconsistent-missing-override] > > At least once we can build with this warning enabled, I recommend > making this warning fatal instead of cover

Re: AdBlock Plus as a ServiceWorker?

2015-05-08 Thread Francois Marier
On 08/05/15 19:42, Frederik Braun wrote: > I thought that the APIs we brought into Firefox by implementing Tracking > Protection were supposed to provide a better (canonical?) way to hook > your own blocker into Firefox. Yes, as long as they're willing to stand up a server [1] that serves their l

Re: AdBlock Plus as a ServiceWorker?

2015-05-08 Thread Frederik Braun
I thought that the APIs we brought into Firefox by implementing Tracking Protection were supposed to provide a better (canonical?) way to hook your own blocker into Firefox. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozil