On Friday, December 19, 2014 at 12:19:11 PM UTC-8, Jason Orendorff wrote:
> So if you go to about:config and set the javascript.options.strict pref,
> you'll get warnings about accessing undefined properties.
>
> js> Math.TAU
> undefined
> /!\ ReferenceError: reference to undefined pro
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
>
> It seems to me that when doing something as privacy sensitive as this we
> should probably figure out exactly what data we want to collect *first*.
> Then, if and only if we can't collect it using in-house code, we should
> consider going with a third p
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:49 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 2:29:32 PM UTC-4, Mark Finkle wrote:
> > There are good reasons for wanting to collect the data. Our marketing and
> > growth goals for 2015 will require spending non-trivial amounts of money.
> > The data will help us spen
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 2:29:32 PM UTC-4, Mark Finkle wrote:
> There are good reasons for wanting to collect the data. Our marketing and
> growth goals for 2015 will require spending non-trivial amounts of money.
> The data will help us spend the money responsibly and efficiently.
> We sti
We wanted to start some transparency around a new integration coming to
Firefox on Mobile [1]. We are planning to integrate a 3rd party install
tracking SDK from a company called Adjust [2] which will send data,
possibly device identity data [3], to a 3rd party server. We don't do this
very much at
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Gabor Krizsanits
wrote:
> I think I'm not the only one experienced issues with reviews from one side
> or the other.
> I'm wondering if we could do some improvements here for everyone's sake.
>
> Here are the issues the way I see it:
> * some parts of the code nee
This is a difficult problem to discuss in the abstract.
It should never be the case that you are "waiting for weeks/months" -
you should either be getting reviews within a week (at worst), or be
getting responses saying "can't spend time reviewing this now". Where
that is not happening, the escala
I think I'm not the only one experienced issues with reviews from one side
or the other.
I'm wondering if we could do some improvements here for everyone's sake.
Here are the issues the way I see it:
* some parts of the code need more peers
- we should identify the areas
- we should select can
On 3/18/15 2:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I think making the location object match URLUtils is futile. There's
so much weirdness about the location object that I think we should
treat it as the special flower that it is.
Other than the
9 matches
Mail list logo
