On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> Are we currently planning to let this default ride into aurora in 2 weeks'
> time?
>From Chris's first message: "e10s will not ride the trains to Aurora 36."
- Ryan
___
dev-platform mailing list
Are we currently planning to let this default ride into aurora in 2
weeks' time?
~ Gijs
On 07/11/2014 21:44, Gavin Sharp wrote:
Yes, it is currently disabled by safe mode.
There is currently a checkbox in prefs to toggle it, in Nightly
builds. When it rides the trains, we'll have to re-evalua
On 11/7/14 1:28 PM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
>We started that with prompting users to opt-in to e10s
>around a month ago and since then around 25% of Nightly users have been
>running with e10s enabled. As we hoped this saw a surge in the nu
Yes, it is currently disabled by safe mode.
There is currently a checkbox in prefs to toggle it, in Nightly
builds. When it rides the trains, we'll have to re-evaluate that
tradeoff at various steps based on the quality level and testing
goals. In the long term it does not make sense to maintain t
- Original Message -
> Thinking ahead: e10s is a big enough change that I suspect we'll see
> high levels of instability when it gets uplifted to Aurora and
> (especially) Beta. Not sure how to avoid that... but will there be an
> easy way to disable it? I think there should be a pref in
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Dave Townsend wrote:
> We started that with prompting users to opt-in to e10s
> around a month ago and since then around 25% of Nightly users have been
> running with e10s enabled. As we hoped this saw a surge in the number of
> bugs filed and helped us understand t
On 11/7/14 9:24 AM, Armen Zambrano wrote:
If we have enabled e10s for nightly, are the normal non-e10s-test jobs
going to run with the pref off?
If not, we would be testing e10s twice on fx36, stop testing non-e10s
fx36 and get non-e10s-regressions sneak into aurora when we uplift
(since I believ
> If we have enabled e10s for nightly, are the normal non-e10s-test jobs going
> to run with the pref off?
Yes.
Gavin
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Armen Zambrano wrote:
> If we have enabled e10s for nightly, are the normal non-e10s-test jobs going
> to run with the pref off?
> If not, we wou
If we have enabled e10s for nightly, are the normal non-e10s-test jobs
going to run with the pref off?
If not, we would be testing e10s twice on fx36, stop testing non-e10s
fx36 and get non-e10s-regressions sneak into aurora when we uplift
(since I believe we're locking to trunk).
regards,
Arm
On 07/11/2014 18:05, ch...@pointlessone.org wrote:
My nightly crashes on start. Well, that's fine and is expected from unstable
software. But now that I've submitted a half a dozen crash reports which pref
do I flip to continue using my browser?
Hold down shift when launching Firefox to ente
On 11/7/14 7:47 AM, Bill McCloskey wrote:
Unfortunately, I checked it a patch yesterday (bug 1092156) that is causing
lots of crashes if you have certain add-ons installed (such as the Gecko
profiler). The crash happens regardless of whether e10s is enabled. Starting up
in safe mode (via -safe
My nightly crashes on start. Well, that's fine and is expected from unstable
software. But now that I've submitted a half a dozen crash reports which pref
do I flip to continue using my browser?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.o
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980
>
> was filed 6 weeks ago, and diagnosed as relating to force rtl (but Firefox's
> fault, because we're passing CPOWs to functions that should never have them)
> within a few days, after which nothing happened.
ForceRTL is not a commonly insta
I had to file https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1095496
:(
Mike.
> On 07 Nov 2014, at 17:33, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
>
> On 07/11/2014 16:26, Dave Townsend wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
>>> Force RTL, e10s perma-c
On 07/11/2014 16:26, Dave Townsend wrote:
wrote:
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most other cases, I only ever see
spinners for remote content (ie can't actua
Marco Bonardo schrieb:
I'm forcing myself to use it for everyday work, but I completely dropped
forceRTL and Flash (I must admit I'm not missing it) to make it usable.
The Flash/Plugins stuff *should* have been fixed, but probably needs
testing.
KaiRo
___
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
> Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes ( https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
> show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most other cases, I only ever see
> spinners for remote content (ie
Unfortunately, I checked it a patch yesterday (bug 1092156) that is causing
lots of crashes if you have certain add-ons installed (such as the Gecko
profiler). The crash happens regardless of whether e10s is enabled. Starting up
in safe mode (via -safe-mode) fixes the problem.
The bad patch has
Try this
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2013Oct/att-0008/Brotli_update_-_20131011.pdf
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Gijs Kruitbosch
wrote:
> Right, it's that last part that is very much not the case for me.
>
> I looked for a bug for a while and decided to just file one:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1095407
My experience upgrading to today's nightly was also p
On 21/10/2014 11:21, Xidorn Quan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read the C++ portibility guide [1], in which it is said that all
> bitfields should have the same type, or some compiler may mishandle the
> code. Is that still true for the compiler set we currently use? The
> compiler the doc mentioned is MSVC+
On 07/11/2014 10:12, Marco Bonardo wrote:
On 07/11/2014 10:40, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most
other cases, I only ever see spinners
On 07/11/2014 10:40, Gijs Kruitbosch wrote:
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most
other cases, I only ever see spinners for remote content (ie can't
actually brows
Where can we read about how this decision was made? On my profiles with
Force RTL, e10s perma-crashes (
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072980 ), and in most
other cases, I only ever see spinners for remote content (ie can't
actually browse the web - doesn't matter too much for me
24 matches
Mail list logo
