PSA: The profiling branch has shut down

2013-11-08 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Hi everyone, I set up the profiling branch a long time ago to build mozilla-central without the --enable-profiling option to catch any regressions that happen in those builds to minimize the chance of things blowing up after an uplift to Aurora (which is always built without --enable-profiling.)

Re: Known-good clang revision?

2013-11-08 Thread Gregory Szorc
On 11/8/13, 4:06 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: What are recent known-good svn revisions of llvm and clang for building Firefox on Linux? The latest revisions I pulled today, llvm rev 194251 and clang rev 194250, refuse to build mozalloc from mozilla-inbound (complaint about operator new being declare

Re: Tasks to implement the Encoding Standard and to reduce encoding autodetection

2013-11-08 Thread Henri Sivonen
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 wrote: > On 11/7/2013 5:42 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> Do Thunderbird developers want to keep decoders that are going away >> from Firefox? These include: > > I don't think any Thunderbird developer is well-informed on the issue of > charsets in

Re: Known-good clang revision?

2013-11-08 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 2013-11-08 7:06 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote: What are recent known-good svn revisions of llvm and clang for building Firefox on Linux? The latest revisions I pulled today, llvm rev 194251

Known-good clang revision?

2013-11-08 Thread Henri Sivonen
What are recent known-good svn revisions of llvm and clang for building Firefox on Linux? The latest revisions I pulled today, llvm rev 194251 and clang rev 194250, refuse to build mozalloc from mozilla-inbound (complaint about operator new being declared as inline). -- Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hs

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-08 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > It is a major discouragement to contributors when their efforts > are regressed or discarded because they are in the way and don't > matter. It wouldn't be reasonable to continue to expect > contributions after doing this. > Yes but ... th

Re: HWA and OMTC on Linux

2013-11-08 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2013-11-07 17:37 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:06 PM, "L. David Baron" wrote: > > > On Thursday 2013-11-07 13:24 -0800, Andreas Gal wrote: > >> On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Karl Tomlinson wrote: > >>> Will any MoCo developers be permitted to spend some time fixin