On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Karl Tomlinson <mozn...@karlt.net> wrote:
> It is a major discouragement to contributors when their efforts > are regressed or discarded because they are in the way and don't > matter. It wouldn't be reasonable to continue to expect > contributions after doing this. > Yes but ... the flip side is that just because someone contributed something doesn't mean we should commit to supporting and shipping that code indefinitely. Throwing out non-OMTC OGL without putting effort into making OMTC > OGL as functional would be doing just that. > Hmm. In what way is OMTC OGL less functional than main-thread OGL, on Linux/X11, today? Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
