nsITimers are officially now safe to use on threads besides the main thread

2013-04-05 Thread Jason Duell
Not that this had been stopping us from using them off-main thread anyway :) nsITimer.idl now clarifies thread usage. For gory details: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=792920 ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Performance Working Group

2013-04-05 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > So do you think our charter comments should push for merging the > group into Web Apps? Or some of the deliverables (e.g., leaving the > navigation timing and performance timing work?). > > (The group is currently standardizing requestAnimat

Re: Proposal for using a multi-headed tree instead of inbound (updated)

2013-04-05 Thread jmaher
My thoughts on why the average build time is shorter on try vs inbound is inbound includes pgo builds and debug builds which have other steps. The try server builds are not usually doing pgo. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Performance Working Group

2013-04-05 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2013-04-05 12:19 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:20 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > > W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Web Performance Working > > Group. For more details, see: > > http://www.w3.org/2013/01/webperf.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web and TV Interest Group

2013-04-05 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2013-04-05 09:45 -0400, David Humphrey wrote: > On 13-04-04 5:24 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Web and TV Interest > >For more details, see: > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Mar/0008.html > >http://www.w3.org/2012/11/webT

Proposal for using a multi-headed tree instead of inbound (updated)

2013-04-05 Thread Kartikaya Gupta
Sorry for starting a new thread, but I screwed up the previous thread by mashing together my replies to unrelated messages in a single message. If you didn't read all the messages in all sub-threads you may have missed my response. Most of my responses were in this message: https://groups.goog

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web and TV Interest Group

2013-04-05 Thread Marcio Galli
I am not anymore within Mozilla (assuming that "at Mozilla" refers to be under contract) but have been working with Gecko in walls ( https://hacks.mozilla.org/2013/04/a-social-aware-dashboard-experience-with-gecko-in-walls/) since 2009 with a general architecture not much different of B2G from a hi

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web and TV Interest Group

2013-04-05 Thread David Humphrey
On 13-04-04 5:24 PM, L. David Baron wrote: W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Web and TV Interest For more details, see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Mar/0008.html http://www.w3.org/2012/11/webTVIGcharter.html Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or obj

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Performance Working Group

2013-04-05 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:20 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > W3C is proposing a revised charter for the Web Performance Working > Group. For more details, see: > http://www.w3.org/2013/01/webperf.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2013Mar/.html > > Mozilla has the opportun

Re: Replacing gcc 4.5 as the default Linux compiler?

2013-04-05 Thread Gabriele Svelto
On 05/04/2013 01:49, Robert Kaiser wrote: Though its feature set seems to be quite helpful for us: http://lwn.net/Articles/543570/ Makes me think that we should at least experiment with it to make sure are issues we have with it will be fixed in a .1 or so and we'll be able to use that. I've g