XULRunner on OS X, Why is not supported?

2012-11-06 Thread richardson . balcacer
At first I tried for a couple of days to try to get xulrunner 16.0.2 to work on my OSX 10.6, until I understoo it wasn't working at all running the 'xulrunner -v' will return an 'error' string where the version should come out. Looking in forums such as this I found out it is a well known error,

Re: GECKO Development?

2012-11-06 Thread richardson . balcacer
El lunes, 5 de noviembre de 2012 13:09:59 UTC-4, Sean Park escribió: > Good Afternoon All, > > > > I apologize in advance if this isn't the right forum to post this question. > > > > I am searching for a company that I can hire for a project regarding some > development work in the Gecko

Re: Compiling XPCOM with gecko-sdk 15 and above.

2012-11-06 Thread jim . mathies
You should look at the new glue libraries that statically link to the crt on Windows - XPCOM_STANDALONE_STATICRUNTIME_GLUE_LDOPTS XPCOM_STATICRUNTIME_GLUE_LDOPTS I believe components use the standalone which is what we use for our exe stubs. ___ dev

Re: Windows 8 and our continuous integration system (tbpl)

2012-11-06 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
This was discussed on the Platform meeting without any objections: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2012-11-06#Roundtable Should I make more noise about this so it does not get missed? Should I blog? I sometimes fear how the press can misinterpret our posts. FTR, asa, ehsan and jimm have in dire

Re: Not prefixing APIs exposed to Web content (was: Re: navigator.id update - FX patches in progress)

2012-11-06 Thread Dave Mandelin
On Friday, June 22, 2012 11:21:05 AM UTC-7, Henri Sivonen wrote: > For reasons stated in http://hsivonen.iki.fi/vendor-prefixes/ I think > we should adopt the policy dbaron proposed ( > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/mozilla.dev.platform/itl6mtx2dxI > ) for CSS for Web-exposed A

Super-review, what shall we do with you?

2012-11-06 Thread Dave Townsend
We've had a policy requiring super-review for certain kinds of patches for a long time. It's changed a couple of times but the current policy (http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html) primarily requires super-review for any patch that introduces or changes an API. Basically any function i

Update your Snappy status for Nov 8 (no meeting this week)

2012-11-06 Thread Lawrence Mandel
Please share your Snappy status on the etherpad by EOD Thursday. https://etherpad.mozilla.org/snappy Lawrence ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Windows 8 and our continuous integration system (tbpl)

2012-11-06 Thread Armen Zambrano G.
Hi all, IT and RelEng are working on creating a new test infrastructure to make obsolete our current Rev3 machines. To better meet our needs, we want to make sure that we test Firefox 32-bit on the right set of platforms. Mozilla currently has continuous integration running (on tbpl.mozilla.org)

Proposal: Not shipping prefixed APIs on the release channel

2012-11-06 Thread Henri Sivonen
I got Warnocked the last time I tried this (https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.platform/5BGtf5GXdxc/discussion). Let's try again. In June, dbaron proposed a policy for experimental CSS features (https://groups.google.com/d/topic/mozilla.dev.platform/itl6mtx2dxI/discussion). My understan

Re: ccache for Windows

2012-11-06 Thread Philip Chee
On 05/11/2012 22:37, Tito wrote: > > The compilation of Thunderbird in Linux is so much faster when ccache is > also part of the compilation process. Thus I was wondering if there is a > way to compile thundebird/firefox with some kind of a caching system for > windows that will speed up the proce

Problem using nsCOMPtr

2012-11-06 Thread bhargava . animesh29
Hi, I have a legacy code which uses Firefox as embedded browser for the application. I migrated code from gecko 1.9 to gecko 2.0 . There were no issues for win32 platform but for win64 there seems to be an issue. I have build the source code to get gecko SDK for win64.The code gets build proper