On 2012-10-12 8:15 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Hi Ehsan,
If you work in Mountain View, I'd like to meet with you to discuss our
options for the OpenBSD integer types problem (bug 634793). (One of
the options is to accept the requested change.) I am sure we can avoid
a Mozilla local patch for this p
On 12/10/12 01:01 PM, Chris Peterson wrote:
> On 10/11/12 7:36 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
>>> 2. Linux is the foundation of B2G and Firefox for Android, where we
>>> *definitely* must deliver
>>> the fastest product we can
>>
>> I totally agree, but it's not clear to me whether continuing to do PGO
>>
Hi Ehsan,
If you work in Mountain View, I'd like to meet with you to discuss our
options for the OpenBSD integer types problem (bug 634793). (One of
the options is to accept the requested change.) I am sure we can avoid
a Mozilla local patch for this problem.
I came from the era of Unix balkaniza
On 2012-10-12 12:18 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Hi Ehsan,
Thank you for your reply.
Hi! Thank you for your swift replies too! :-)
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Do we require to maintain source or binary compatibility, or both?
As BDS said, both are required in gene
On 10/11/2012 1:34 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 02:26:33PM -0400, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote:
On 10/11/2012 02:33 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:57:53PM -0400, Justin Lebar wrote:
By "turning off Linux PGO testing", you really mean "stop making and
dis
Hello,
The Graphics meeting will take place this Monday at 2:30 PM US/Pacific
time. That could be Tuesday in your timezone.
Please first add your agenda items there:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/GFX/2012-October-15
* Not every Monday at 2:30 PM Pacific Time
* +1 650 903 0800 x92 Conf# 9936
David Anderson wrote:
> It's still unclear to me what our Linux PGO builds mean. Do
> distributions use them? If not, are they using the exact same
> compiler version and PGO environment data? If not, then they have a
> different configuration that we haven't tested.
I agree that we should make su
On 10/11/12 7:36 PM, Justin Lebar wrote:
2. Linux is the foundation of B2G and Firefox for Android, where we
*definitely* must deliver
the fastest product we can
I totally agree, but it's not clear to me whether continuing to do PGO
on desktop Linux has any effect on our ability to potentially
Hi Ehsan,
Thank you for your reply.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
> Do we require to maintain source or binary compatibility, or both?
As BDS said, both are required in general. Source compatibility can be
broken if it is not disruptive, and that's often hard to assess
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Do we require to maintain source or binary compatibility, or both?
> Also, is it acceptable for us to add new preprocessor definitions
> such as NO_NSPR_10_SUPPORT to optionally remove some of the NSPR
> feature which we would like Gecko to avoid, without changing the
> defau
On 10/12/2012 10:25 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Do we require to maintain source or binary compatibility, or both?
Also, is it acceptable for us to add new preprocessor definitions such
as NO_NSPR_10_SUPPORT to optionally remove some of the NSPR feature
which we would like Gecko to avoid, withou
On 2012-10-11 8:52 PM, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
Ehsan wrote:
It is entirely unreasonable to render ourselves unable to modify
our imported code (just look at the current situation with NSPR
which causes developers to go through huge pain in order to work
around things which would be very simply deal
One of the Firebug automated tests is using following script to check
that XHR displayed in the Console panel (and the Net panel) is
properly finished if aborted:
var request = new XMLHttpRequest();
request.open("POST", "", true);
request.send(null);
request.abort();
It works in Firefox 17, where
Marcio Galli wrote:
> @Paul,
>
> What is your use case BTW? when you say "update views" based on mutations,
> is the goal is to let the user know what is going on? Or you actually
> performing other mutations back to the DOM or logging things or creating
> reports?
For example: if you start the
smaug wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 02:40 PM, Paul Rouget wrote:
> >Context: in the firefox devtools, we need to track some nodes and update
> >different "views" based on what's happening to this node (show its parents,
> >show its child, show its attributes, …).
> >
> >The new Mutation observers are very
Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Paul Rouget wrote:
> > Paul Rouget wrote:
> >> Context: in the firefox devtools, we need to track some nodes and update
> >> different "views" based on what's happening to this node (show its parents,
> >> show its child, show its attributes,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:28:43AM -0700, David Anderson wrote:
> On Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:49:07 PM UTC-7, Brian Smith wrote:
> > I think it is important to give Linux users the fastest browser we
> > can give them, because:
>
> It's still unclear to me what our Linux PGO builds mean. Do
>
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:49:07 PM UTC-7, Brian Smith wrote:
> I think it is important to give Linux users the fastest browser we can give
> them, because:
It's still unclear to me what our Linux PGO builds mean. Do distributions use
them? If not, are they using the exact same compiler ver
18 matches
Mail list logo
