Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2022-10-24 Thread Siyuan Feng
@mbaret > TOSA/Linalg are both graph dialects, but they don't fulfill the same function The definition of "same" is subjective; of course, different people can have different opinions that are less grounded. For example, what if many, or even the majority of people think a proposal contains su

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2022-10-24 Thread Matthew Barrett
@Hzfengsy I don't think it's fair or accurate to dismiss legitimate concerns of community contributors as 'subjective'. @areusch has already enumerated in some detail an 'objective' list of impacts that an S0 module can have on the wider project. I think at a minimum we should be addressing th

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2022-10-24 Thread Siyuan Feng
Hi, @areusch Thank you, for posting the analysis of the benefits and drawbacks of merging a module. I would like to point out that there are a few critical pieces that are missing (mainly on the community side): - Welcome new contributors who would become an added force, these contributors als

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [Process RFC] Empowering New Scoped Module to the Project (PR #95)

2022-10-24 Thread Siyuan Feng
@mbaret > I don't think it's fair or accurate to dismiss legitimate concerns of > community contributors as 'subjective'. @areusch has already enumerated in > some detail an 'objective' list of impacts that an S0 module can have on the > wider project. I think at a minimum we should be address