all the task done, thanks @comaniac and @masahi for the kindly review, thanks
@rebel-shshin for the follow up, close this issue now.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8596#issuecomment-1193049300
You are receiving this because you are subs
Closed #8596 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8596#event-7049768479
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
> > > > thanks @masahi for the follow up, I am also looking forward a chance to
> > > > do a demo after all patch upstream done.
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi @huajsj, do you have any plan to do a demo with compiling deep
> > > learning models such as [TF model to
> > > relay]([https://tvm.apache.org/d
> > thanks @masahi for the follow up, I am also looking forward a chance to do
> > a demo after all patch upstream done.
>
> Hi @huajsj, do you have any plan to do a demo with compiling deep learning
> models such as [TF model to
> relay]([https://tvm.apache.org/docs/how_to/compile_models/from_
thanks @masahi for the follow up, I am also looking forward a chance to do a
demo after all patch upstream done.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8596#issuecomment-1042138704
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this threa
@comaniac, I just updated this issue to move these planned PR not belong to
this solution to sperate tables to avoid confuse, please check.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issue
@comaniac , sure, already add the future PR plan.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8596#issuecomment-966600356
@comaniac , thanks for the follow up, just saw this comments, already done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/8596#issuecomment-966581046
> btw, please change the RFC file name to align the PR number (0014).
@comaniac, thanks for the follow up, the file name change already done.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs
@comaniac , @jtuyls , all review comments addressed, please review again.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/14#issuecomment-895495549
Split relay graph into Subgraph then doing Subgraph Pipeline :RFC
In this RFC, we present a new framework for subgraph pipelining that first
split relay graph into multiple subgraph/group operator s then doing
subgraph/group operators scheduling
Discussion:
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc
PR https://github.com/apache/tvm/pull/7892
Discussion
https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-compute-graph-pipeline-with-new-subgraph-executor/9839/
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tv
12 matches
Mail list logo
