[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Rename GraphRuntime and ilk to e.g. GraphExecutor

Yeah that is a good point. I do think that if we are going with Executor to describe the runtime, we should rename the existing `tvm.relay.Executor` interface to something e.g. `ExecutorWrapper`. We could also contemplate the future of `relay.create_executor`, but should probably do that in a

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] RFC Process Update (#2)

Ah, I saw your latest comment from the TVM archiver to dev@ list. Maybe I accidentally delete the previous emails. I think we are still good. Thanks, Chris -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] RFC Process Update (#2)

It looks like the forum is being archived. I don't know why that particular topic was missed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/2#issuecomment-810619601

Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] RFC Process Update (#2)

Are we not sending the copy of topics from discuss.tvm.apache.org to dev@ mailing list anymore? I could not find the email copy for the TVM discuss that linked with this PR: https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-update-rfc-process/9033 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to thi

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Update RFC Process

The RFC repository has been seeded with a template, and I've sent up a pull request that attempts to capture the process discussed here. Please take a look and review, and we can formally begin the RFC process once that is complete. https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/2 Thank! Chris

[apache/tvm-rfcs] RFC Process Update (#2)

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/2 -- Commit Summary -- * RFC Process Update -- File Changes -- M README.md (60) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfcs/pull/2.patch https://github.com/apache/tvm-rfc

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] DataLoader -- an API to wrap datasets from other machine learning frameworks

Thanks, the batched inputs thing makes sense, I misunderstood! I also didn't mean to imply that batch size itself is unnecessary- I do think it's a fairly universal concept for data loading (except for perhaps dynamic models where the input shape changes for each instance, but in this case you

[Apache TVM Discuss] [Development/RFC] [RFC] Rename GraphRuntime and ilk to e.g. GraphExecutor

perhaps we should rename the existing GraphExecutor? https://github.com/apache/tvm/blob/main/python/tvm/relay/build_module.py#L366 --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-rename-graphruntime-and-ilk-to-e-g-graphexecutor/9255/15) to respond. You are receiving this because y