Yeah that is a good point. I do think that if we are going with Executor to describe the runtime, we should rename the existing `tvm.relay.Executor` interface to something e.g. `ExecutorWrapper`. We could also contemplate the future of `relay.create_executor`, but should probably do that in a separate interface.
do others have thoughts? --- [Visit Topic](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/t/rfc-rename-graphruntime-and-ilk-to-e-g-graphexecutor/9255/16) to respond. You are receiving this because you enabled mailing list mode. To unsubscribe from these emails, [click here](https://discuss.tvm.apache.org/email/unsubscribe/38816b4d890294ff4210e382213423809b91a719946e9b86c95765b8a5c64162).
