@spectrometerHBH it would be great if you can take a stab to get the first
strawman syntax and parser
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/7302#issuecomment-762330423
I see, I don't think the thread binding can come with additional annotations,
which might simplify the problem (if we enforce such check in IR validation).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/
The problem is that launch_thread was not designed to print those additional
hints，since launch_thread was syntax for Attr now.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/apache/tvm/issues/7302#issue
Thanks @junrushao1994 We have already some mechanism to print the low level
thread binding via attr (printed as launch_thread). When the threadIdx is
shared in multiple launch point, the var is printed separately. Otherwise it is
printed inline to the code. I believe we could adopt a similar st
