The Jakarta TLP is about to retire to the attic; however the taglibs
site still refers to non-existent jakarta pages for the downloads.
A bug [1] was raised for this for this some while ago, but there
appears to be no-one interested in fixing the issue.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show
On 2 December 2011 17:35, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Filip,
>
> On 12/2/11 12:26 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Chris, this would be your [cue] to rethink the solution one step further
>> down the line.
>> Not too long ago, I add in a property validator. Tomcat used to silently
>> ignored
On 16 December 2011 16:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 16:06, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> Please Mark calm down.
>
> No, I will not calm down. The release process has been changed without
> prior discussion and on top of that it is now broken for Maven
> artefacts. That is not acceptable.
>
On 16 December 2011 23:45, Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
>> 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
>> 2. Nexus
>
> I don't have a strong preference between them. Is there a differ
On 17 December 2011 05:19, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/16/11 12:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> There are currently two options for publishing JARs to Maven Central:
>> 1. scp+rsync via people.a.o
>> 2. Nexus
>>
>> Personally, my only requirements are:
>> a) that the JARs reach Maven Centra
On 18 December 2011 18:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/17/11 11:42 AM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>>
>>> On 17/12/2011 18:35, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
> On 17/12/2011 18:14, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> Ok then interprete my words as: n
On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> > Ok, let's do it again :-D
>> > 1. Standardization. Maven strongly encourages to use a standardized
>> > structure. The source should go into src/main/java, the resour
On 19 December 2011 14:16, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb
>
>> On 19 December 2011 08:36, Antonio Petrelli
>> wrote:
>> > 2011/12/17 Mark Thomas
>> >
>> >> On 17/12/2011 20:24, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>> >> > Ok, l
Some users are asking for JMeter jars to be uploaded to Maven Central.
At present, we use Ant to build JMeter, so it would be useful to be
able to just package up the jars and deploy them without needing to
maintain dummy Maven poms.
I can see that Tomcat7 jars are in Maven, but as far as I can t
On 13 January 2012 14:26, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/01/2012 13:41, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Have a look here:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/res/maven/
Thanks, that's what I needed.
Perhaps consider adding a reference to this at the end of /BUILDING.txt?
> +1 a
On 16 January 2012 09:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
> It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
> the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
> [1]. Post the switch to Nexus, none of the previous releases appear in
> the metadata [2].
>
> The switc
On 16 January 2012 10:53, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/1/16 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/01/2012 09:43, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> It appears there is a problem with the Nexus release process. Prior to
>>> the switch to Nexus, the Maven metedata contained all previous releases
>>> [1]. Post the switch t
On 16 January 2012 13:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/01/2012 12:23, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> I think it's here (thanks)
>> But you need to close it (tru the ui) in order we can consume
>> artifacts from this staged repository.
>
> OK. Closed.
Normally Nexus sends messages to a mailing list when sta
On 19 January 2012 14:51, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52489
>
> Sebb changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> Summary|En
On 27 January 2012 13:38, wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
>
> Pid changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
>
> Status|NEW |
On 29 January 2012 10:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/01/2012 01:20, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Not complaining - it's great to add this feature, please commit it - but
>> I'm wondering
>> if a lighter interface wouldn't be better. From loo
On 26 January 2012 18:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to release the Apache Tomcat Maven plugin 2.0-beta-1.
>
> The staging repository is available here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-142/
> The documentation site is available here:
> http://tomcat
On 1 February 2012 11:13, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for those suggestions !
> 2012/2/1 sebb :
>> On 26 January 2012 18:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to release the Apache Tomcat Maven plugin 2.0-beta-1.
>>>
On 1 February 2012 10:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> As the others currently provided tomcat maven artifacts, adding those
> in the download section doesn't have (IMHO) sense.
> Because to be able to consume it within a maven build, users will have
> to install it locally respecting the maven
On 1 February 2012 11:56, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/2/1 sebb :
>> On 1 February 2012 10:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> As the others currently provided tomcat maven artifacts, adding those
>>> in the download section doesn't have (IMHO) sense.
&g
On 1 February 2012 13:33, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/2/1 Mark Thomas :
>> On 01/02/2012 13:01, sebb wrote:
>>> On 1 February 2012 11:56, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>> 2012/2/1 sebb :
>>>>> On 1 February 2012 10:14, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>>>
On 7 February 2012 06:13, wrote:
> Author: costin
> Date: Tue Feb 7 06:13:36 2012
> New Revision: 1241356
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1241356&view=rev
> Log:
> Add the new ssl methods from tomcat-native ( and few poll methods that seemed
> to be missing ).
>
> APR connector will n
On 13 February 2012 13:50, wrote:
> Author: kkolinko
> Date: Mon Feb 13 13:50:43 2012
> New Revision: 1243508
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1243508&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
> Correct typos in tools.html
>
> s/licence/license/ seems
On 15 February 2012 20:04, Jeremy Brown wrote:
>>That is a comment that the layout needs to be
>>cleaner (a comment I agree with).
>
> I agree too. I tried to create a cleaner layout and I posted a mockup for
> all to see and voice their opinions.
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/jjbosstracker/TomcatM
On 23 February 2012 19:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/2/23 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Feb 23 18:44:02 2012
>> New Revision: 1292891
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1292891&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix BZ52750. Correctly parse command options
>> Port of r1292878 from 7.0.x
>>
>>
On 26 February 2012 23:33, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> OK. Artefacts re-staged at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-084/
Looks a bit odd to have
orgapachetomcat
above
yet the Maven package is org.apache.taglibs ?
But perhaps that's just a feature of Nexus.
Using
On 28 February 2012 16:43, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 12:33 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>
>> OK. Artefacts re-staged at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-084/
>>
>
> +1
> Signatures and content OK.
>
> Although not sure why you have LICENSE and LICENSE.txt
s parent pom.
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
>
>> On Feb 28, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/28/2012 08:57 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>> On 28 February 2012 16:43, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Although
On 29 February 2012 02:19, wrote:
> Author: jboynes
> Date: Wed Feb 29 02:19:53 2012
> New Revision: 1294943
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294943&view=rev
> Log:
> remove LICENCE.txt and NOTICE.txt as they are automatically added by Maven
> release process
-1
I think that's the wr
t; On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:14 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 29 February 2012 05:11, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2012/2/29 Jeremy Boynes :
>>>> Removed from svn. A dry run of the next release shows they are
>>>> automatically added to the source bundle.
>&g
OV)
AFAICT that just moves the work from maintaining the N&L to creating
and maintaining the metadata.
It also means that the N&L files are not present in SVN (unless they
are checked in after generation).
> BTW Did you create any issues for that ?
>
> 2012/2/29 sebb :
>> O
On 1 March 2012 18:27, wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Thu Mar 1 18:27:56 2012
> New Revision: 1295724
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1295724&view=rev
> Log:
> Allow the examples to configure the buffer on the fly
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/websoc
On 4 March 2012 03:44, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:37 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 29 February 2012 19:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Perso, I prefer using something which read pom and generate
>>> automatically N&L from metadatas rather than maintai
n. If in the future we add
> dependencies with notice requirements we can add that to the particular
> module at that time.
OK, great.
> On Mar 4, 2012, at 5:40 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 March 2012 03:44, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:37 AM, sebb wr
On 24 March 2012 14:45, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> The proposed 2 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for
> voting.
>
> This release addresses issues found during the 1 release process including
> duplicate LICENSE files and poor site configuration.
>
> The Maven staging repo is:
>
On 31 March 2012 03:23, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> From the log:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/taglib-standard/2/consoleText
>
> Parsing POMs
> ERROR: Failed to parse POMs
> hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/taglib-standard at
> hudson.
On 10 May 2012 08:50, wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Thu May 10 07:50:29 2012
> New Revision: 1336516
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1336516&view=rev
> Log:
> Add public method to retrieve the current connectionCount
> from an endpoint.
>
> It will also show up in the ThreadPool MBean.
On 9 May 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.36 release candidate is ready
> for vote at [1]. This version solves shared memorz regression(s)
> found in released version 1.2.35 and allows )again= compiling
> against old httpd 1.3.x.
>
>
> The VOTE will remain open
On 21 May 2012 21:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/05/2012 17:52, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> On 05/21/2012 02:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> I am trying to build the 1.1.x native connector from trunk so I can test
>>> the changes I plan to make to support per socket time outs. I can build
>>> using dynami
On 14 June 2012 15:58, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
> Tomcat Native 1.1.24 stable.
Please include a brief synopsis (1 or 2 sentences) of the purpose of
the TLP/Product in all announcements sent outside the TLP mailing
lists.
The devel
On 15 June 2012 10:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.28 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.28/
The NOTICE file for the source archive includes references to Nullsoft
and Eclipse whic
Do these patches need to be fed back to Commons DBCP?
Or do they only apply to the version embedded by Tomcat?
On 14 July 2012 21:47, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 14.07.2012 22:25, Filip Hanik Mailing Lists wrote:
>>
>> I know, it's the same patch for DBCP as for DBCP2.
>
>
> Roger that.
>
>
>> we ca
mmons dev list. If no-one brings it
> up sooner, I'll bring it up once Pool2 is sorted as work will naturally
> move to dbcp2 at that point.
>
> Mark
>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "sebb"
>>> To: "Tomcat Developers
On 6 July 2012 07:53, wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jul 6 06:53:52 2012
> New Revision: 1358055
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1358055&view=rev
> Log:
> implement rev 1 of async/non blocking writes
>
> @@ -146,8 +226,12 @@ public class InternalNioOutputBuffer ext
> * @thro
On 22 July 2012 20:55, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Jul 22 19:55:50 2012
> New Revision: 1364419
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1364419&view=rev
> Log:
> Fingbugs: Fix possible NPE
>
> Modified:
>
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/group/interceptors/TcpPingInter
On 1 August 2012 19:39, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2012/7/31 :
>> Author: olamy
>> Date: Tue Jul 31 16:01:20 2012
>> New Revision: 1367640
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1367640&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [MTOMCAT-157] use new Maven Plugins annotations. done for tomcat6 mojos.
>>
>> Modifi
On 6 July 2012 07:53, wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jul 6 06:53:52 2012
> New Revision: 1358055
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1358055&view=rev
> Log:
> implement rev 1 of async/non blocking writes
>
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/InternalNioOutputB
On 16 August 2012 23:44, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> All,
>
> The first item in the TOMCAT-NEXT.txt is this:
>
> 1. Refactor the TLD parsing. TLDs are currently parsed twice. Once by
> Catalina looking for listeners and once by Jasper.
>
> I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins
On 17 August 2012 05:00, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> On 8/16/12 7:11 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 August 2012 23:44, Christopher Schultz
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had a conversation in Vancouver with David Blevins about the scourge
>>> o
On 12 October 2012 13:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/10/2012 13:24, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
> Please use quoting, particularly when you have a few short comments on a
> very large e-mail. Without quoting, your comments were more effort to find.
>
>>> Added: tomcat/trunk/java/javax/net/websocket/H
On 12/06/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Jun 12 11:38:29 2009
> New Revision: 784083
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784083&view=rev
> Log:
> Implement alias resources. Key features:
> - configured at the context level in the same way as the other resource
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Sebb, thanks for the feedback.
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > Apart from the problems with N&L files etc that have already been
> > mentioned, I found the following:
> >
> > ==
> >
> > The chang
On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Cleaned up and fixed.
>
> The release is located here:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.4/
NOTICE file is incorrect, it should read:
>>>
Apache Tomcat JDBC Pool
Copyright 2008-2009 The Apache Software Foundation
This product inc
The copyright year in the NOTICE files in the binary archive is still
2008; surely it should be 2009?
The connectors/NOTICE file in the source archive is wrong.
There are no NOTICE files for the jasper and servletapi directory sub-trees.
It would be better to have a single N&L file at the top of
On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
> New Revision: 785164
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164&view=rev
> Log:
> Update exclusion list for EOL filtering
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/container/branches/tc4.1.x/build.xml
>
> Modif
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 16/06/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: markt
> >> Date: Tue Jun 16 11:17:26 2009
> >> New Revision: 785164
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=785164&
; > [ ] Broken
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] Stable
>
>
> There were enough issues to re-roll the release. For the record, I tried
> and failed on several machines to recreate the problem sebb saw so I can
> only assume it was a local JVM issue.
I'v
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> > The candidates source tarball and derived binaries are available here:
> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-
On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem invalid
> to me.
Please revisit, especially the NOTICE files.
> Filip
>
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 15/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
On 17/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 16/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Sebb, I can't find anything that is broken. All your concerns seem
> invalid
> > > to me.
> > >
> > >
On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Tim Funk wrote:
> > I think this needs to be volatile ?
> > In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
> >> +private long currentMillis = 0;
> >
> > Same for (in TimeDateElementBenchmarkTest)
> >> +private Date currentDate = null;
> >
> > Of course - sinc
On 18/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 18/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> > Tim Funk wrote:
> > > I think this needs to be volatile ?
> > > In (GetDateBenchmarkTest)
> > >> +private long currentMillis = 0;
> > >
> > > Same for (i
On 19/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> So now that we've clarified that NOTICE and LICENSE covers the entire
> release as an entity,
No idea what you mean by that, but anyway:
As I have written several times before, the NOTICE file is incorrect.
This applies to the version in the SVN ta
Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
--
On 19/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
>
> 661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
> 662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
>
> Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit
etimes create a new Date
unecessarily.
>
>
> 2009/6/19 sebb
>
>
> > On 19/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> > > Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
> > >
> > > 661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
&
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jun 19 15:05:04 2009
> New Revision: 786532
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786532&view=rev
> Log:
> Correct per sebb/markt
Sorry, but this is still incorrect.
The NOTICE is now:
On 19/06/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jun 19 16:16:16 2009
> New Revision: 786569
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786569&view=rev
> Log:
> correction
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/NOTICE
>
> Modified: tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-po
On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
> available here:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
>
> According to the release process, the release based on the 4.0.40 tag is:
Did you mean 4.1.40?
Also, where can I
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 16/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> >> The (updated) candidates source tarball and derived binaries are
> >> available here:
> >> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.40/
> >>
On 19/06/2009, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kkolinko
> Date: Fri Jun 19 18:57:59 2009
> New Revision: 786631
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786631&view=rev
> Log:
> Add two more implementations for the second test.
> a) using a single ThreadLocal instead of multiple ones
>
On 19/06/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > The source archives mostly agree with the tags, however there are code
> > changes in the following files:
> >
> > connectors/http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11/Http11Processor.java
> > connectors/uti
On 19/06/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Fri Jun 19 20:21:53 2009
> New Revision: 786653
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=786653&view=rev
> Log:
> Switch to ThreadLocal where possible. This removes all the syncs apart from
> those related to accessing the log f
On 22/06/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Jun 22 11:58:07 2009
> New Revision: 787211
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=787211&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix a couple of Eclipse warnings
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/catalina/startup/TestTomcat.java
On 22/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> in the spirit of trying to get my poop right,
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Looks a lot better.
> the binary releases contain everything in individual jar files (including
> source references for IDEs)
However, there are
On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Cleaned up and fixed.
>
> The release is located here:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.5/
Exactly the same path names were used previously; I assume you are
referring to the following versions of the files:
apache-tomcat-jdbc-1.
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Cleaned up and fixed.
> > >
> > > The release is located here:
> > > http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-
On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
> > On 26/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> >
> >
> > > sebb wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 24/06/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev List
When testing with Derby on Java 1.6.0 I get the following error:
[junit] Running org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tomcat.jdbc.test.StarvationTest
[junit] AbandonedObjectPool is used
(org.apache.tomcat.dbcp.dbcp.abandonedobjectp...@1d6096)
[ju
On 27/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> But how could ThreadLocal be shared among all AccessLogValve instances on
> the same server? After all, each thread access ThreadLocal has its own.
>
> Another point, based on the java doc of ThreadLocal, maybe "private
> ThreadLocal currentDateStruct" shoul
I've just realised that there is no Javadoc in any of the archives.
The only documentation is in the form of a web-page, which is fine as
far as it goes, but is really not enough for a general-purpose
library.
I would expect to see the Javadoc included in binary releases.
On 24/06/2009, Filip Ha
On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
> New Revision: 789392
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove all usage of GPL or LGPL downloads.
+1, thanks.
> Use H2 for test database (EPL1.0) as it can be downlo
On 29/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 29/06/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: fhanik
> > Date: Mon Jun 29 17:38:21 2009
> > New Revision: 789392
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789392&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Remove all
On 30/06/2009, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Tue Jun 30 13:26:10 2009
> New Revision: 789714
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789714&view=rev
> Log:
> Separate statistics counter lock in FastAsyncSocketSender
> from inherited DataSender lock to reduce blocking duri
On 30/06/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Tue Jun 30 19:15:28 2009
> New Revision: 789883
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=789883&view=rev
> Log:
> Apply patch by sebb from
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=474
On 01/07/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jul 1 13:19:15 2009
> New Revision: 790155
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790155&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43343
> Port of r656751, r778523, r778524, r784453 and r784
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Thu Jul 2 17:35:26 2009
> New Revision: 790693
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790693&view=rev
> Log:
> break out javadoc into its own target
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/build.xml
>
> Modified
On 02/07/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Thu Jul 2 17:08:50 2009
> New Revision: 790684
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=790684&view=rev
> Log:
> Add some doco, make shared variables volatile
>
> Modified:
>
> tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/java/org/apa
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> think it should be all in order now
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
Eclipse and Findbugs show the following warnings for the non-test code:
Description ResourcePathTypeLocation
Class is a raw type. Refere
On 07/07/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > As was written early in this my thread:
> >
> http://www.nabble.com/Coding-Guidelines%2C-encodings%2C-keywords-td23662661.html
> > (http://markmail.org/thread/d6dsgrsfvnuzclt7)
> >
> > there are problems with Subversion $Date$
On 16/07/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Jul 16 19:34:49 2009
> New Revision: 794798
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=794798&view=rev
> Log:
> More GSOC work from Xie Xiadong
> Initial implementation of RemoteHost and RemoteAddr filters.
>
> Added:
> t
On 14/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> think it should be all in order now
>
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/v1.0.6/
There are some differences between the source archives and the SVN tag:
In SVN, but not in source archive:
.classpath
.project
sign
On 22/07/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jul 22 14:29:09 2009
> New Revision: 796739
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796739&view=rev
> Log:
> Restore the @Overrides. Eclipse on my Mac wasn't configured right. Sorry for
> the noise.
The build.properties.de
On 23/07/2009, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> > Correct, servlet 3.0 requires minimum 1.6
> > so we don't have to build down to 1.5 anymore
> >
> > Filip
>
>
> I think sebb needs to do an svn up. build.properties.default has sp
On 23/07/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Jul 23 17:15:55 2009
> New Revision: 797151
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797151&view=rev
> Log:
> Correct the file name
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/trunk/build.xml
>
> Modified: tomcat/trunk/build.xml
> URL:
>
On 24/07/2009, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 23.07.2009 20:43, sebb wrote:
> > On 23/07/2009, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: markt
> >> Date: Thu Jul 23 17:15:55 2009
> >> New Revision: 797151
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/vie
On 24/07/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jul 24 15:25:17 2009
> New Revision: 797529
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797529&view=rev
> Log:
> update test cases
>
> Modified:
>
> tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/test/org/apache/tomcat/jdbc/test/Abandon
On 24/07/2009, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Fri Jul 24 15:24:52 2009
> New Revision: 797528
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=797528&view=rev
> Log:
> Add in Linux special case for performance optimization around locking.
> Set default queue to be the fair one
>
On 24/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5.5/v5.5.28/
There is no .zip version of apache-tomcat-5.5.28-fulldocs.tar.gz
The source archives contain the file
container/webapps/admin/images/Thumbs.db
which does not belong in the archive.
Also
On 25/07/2009, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 25.07.2009 01:44, sebb wrote:
> > On 24/07/2009, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>
> > Likewise, the file tomcat-users.xml looks wrong - it says that there
> > is no user with the manager role, yet it contains the following entr
1 - 100 of 426 matches
Mail list logo
