The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.14/
According to the release process, the 1.1.14 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscri
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45272
turns out that IE doesn't like
Path="/"
but it does like
Path=/
Do you mean that it also doesn't like
Path=/myapp or does it like it?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
so, IE, doesn't really do RFC-2109,
I would
Brian Hawkins wrote:
I've finally been able to get the client certificate while using tomcat
native for my SSL connections. This is using Tomcat 5.5.25.
Could you open a bugzilla on this one...
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Here is what doesn't work:
Calling request.getAttribute("javax.servlet.req
Henri Gomez wrote:
Where could we found, when release, the 1.1.14 for windows ?
I plan to do this today.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Regards
2008/7/1 Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Jean-Frederic,
jean-frederic clere schrieb:
The candidates binaries are available here
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.14 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.13.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Do
Mark Thomas wrote:
I've just attached a couple of patches to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
One of the patches is a patch to native and since all I know just about
know enough C to be dangerous, I would be grateful if someone who
actually knows what they are doing wh
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi JFC,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jul 9 05:36:55 2008
New Revision: 675147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=675147&view=rev
Log:
The $(shell \ls $(JK_DIR)/*.c) doesn't seem to work replace it with a
list of files.
# Defines for example NS
Mladen Turk wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
I've put the binaries to
archive.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
and (1.1.14 only) to
www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/
Not sure why but archive is not yet populated
(probably its some mirroring issue)
The heanet.ie site
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.17/
According to the release process, the 6.0.17 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
I see consistent failures to start (CNFE) with the -security opti
David Barnes wrote:
Jean-Frederic,
Thank you for your guidance in how to submit doc
corrections, and thanks for the rapid turnaround.
I may submit more
edits in the future: was the format of my bug reports and patch files
correct?
Buzilla is a good way to do this, mail to the dev too. I prefer
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The plan is to tag it later today.
Comments ?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deepak Mishra wrote:
hello.
pardon me as a newbie if these comments seem to be awkward...
i searched the archives, but failed to find any such thing with
reference to
tomcat6.
what i have read till now, i feel WARP to be more faster and efficient
than AJP (maybe the book authors were biased !!)
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using "::" will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address="" (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address="0.0.0.0" : bind on all IPv4 addresses.
address="::" : bind all IPv6
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using "::" will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address="" (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
there is a required patch in STATUS.txt before I can actually move this,
right now its failing TCK tests
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
How about cutting a release candidate on Monday, Aug 18th and if all
is well, have a release towards end of next week?
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix wrong default in doc.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml?rev=689758&r1=689757&r2=689758&view=dif
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600&view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
-1: If won't work if the there is only one IPv6 address and I don't see
how that could be th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600&view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
Well, I was too fast in my comment...
In case we don't find an IPv6 returning sa is probably
Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to release a new version of native so that it works
on my setup ?
Sure. Jean-Frederic was RM for the last one.
I can do it if he doesn't have the time.
I am on it ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Regards
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.15/
According to the release process, the 1.1.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscri
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.15 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.14.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Do
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:23 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
The draft is here:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315
I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken?
I was not aware of that file for whatever reason. I now remember the
language that was discussed, and I reme
Mladen Turk wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
There are few issues and questions, I'm not sure its as simple as it
looks
:-)
For new development - are you going to make changes in both branches ? I
assume there will be
features that can only be done in 1.3.
Right.
1.1.x will be in bug fixing m
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
do you guys have any thoughts on this?
+1.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
that would be nice if we then coul
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Let's get a feel for what we think we should do.
Based on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038
I believe (pick only one):
a. [ ] It doesn't belong here, take it elsewhere
b. [ ] Bring it here, we'll ship it with next major version of Tomcat
c.
Mark Thomas wrote:
Quick question. How do I figure out which APR and openSSL versions were
used to built the binary downloads of the native connectors?
For APR it should what is in the jnirelease.sh: apr-1.2.8 for openssl
there are no clear recommendations.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Cheers,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build), and one API typo.
Since we are in the release mania any objections to that?
Do
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:23 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build), and
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take the
bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual module
reasons
1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat
2. We can release it more frequently to fix bugs
3. If ther
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello to the Tomcat team,
JK 1.2.27 has been available for testing for two weeks as a svn
snapshot. Several bugs have been found and fixed. So I would like
to proceed with the release vote.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
htt
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
please help promote the ApacheCon live video streaming by forwarding
the email below to your PMC user and dev mailing lists, ASAP!
Thank you
Lars Eilebrecht
-
Subject: ApacheCon live video streaming available; keynotes and A
Mladen Turk wrote:
sebb wrote:
I happened to spot the following in ssl.c:
static int jbs_gets(BIO *b, char *out, int outl)
...
int l = (int)strlen(J2S(o));
if (l < outl) {
strcpy(out, J2S(o));
ret = outl;
}
...
return ret;
It looks a bit odd to me - I would have expected it to return l
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
r718796 seems to work fine for me
in r718819 tomcat wont even startup
Well r719198 works on my machine F9 Sun JVM.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I think we need to roll back the mass checkins done lately, please don't
roll my checkins back, they are simple but impor
George Sexton wrote:
George Sexton wrote:
When I looked at the Commons-Daemon one, all of the entries were 3 or
more years old, so I didn't think it was in use.
At least the change log didn't have anything more current than 3 years...
I will try to check the JIRA's of commons=daemon and
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain it)?
See http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to ex
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to ex
Lorenz Breu wrote:
hi guys
i just did a quick check on the tomcat-native homepage and noticed two
things haven't changed:
a) link to the 1.1.15 binaries is broken
The link should go to 1.1.16. I have fixed it.
b) 1.1.16 sources still contain the typos in multicast.c
What is the bugzilla co
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I am planning on tagging the Tomcat JDBC pool for a first release.
First alpha? B-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
Hi,
A new tutorial has been added to the ApacheCon Web site:
"Everything Tomcat - Administering, Tuning, Troubleshooting and Develop".
That is a 2 day tutorial given by Mark Thomas who is one of the greatest
tomcat developers. Getting a tutorial during the ApacheCon is the
oportunity to get more
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
If you look at my message, my favourite is *not* a JK3. I'm in favor of
jk
1.3. The difference for me is that 1.3 will be very close to 1.2 without
any
bug architectural changes like migrating to APR.
ok.
I adde
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello,
I'm thinking about branching JK, so adding
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/branches/jk1.2.x
and initially populate the branch with the contents of the 1.2.28 tag.
The motivation is to stabilize 1.2 and restrict further changes on 1.
Rainer Jung wrote:
A few comments inline.
On 06.04.2009 17:09, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Apr 6 15:09:19 2009
New Revision: 762374
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=762374&view=rev
Log:
First support for httpd-trunk heartbeat logic.
Added:
tomcat/trunk/java/o
f the firewall
will not work.
The idea is to use this code with the already existing code in
httpd-trunk and the httpd module uses multicast.
But yes I agree that the idea to use TCP/HTTP is a good option too but
that requires more code on the httpd side.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
jean-fre
It requires some new code in httpd-trunk to work...
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
It requires some new code in httpd-trunk to work...
sounds like you're reinventing the wheel in tomcat trunk to avoid code
in httpd trunk :)
Not completely :)
The logic in httpd-trunk is for a multicast socket I want to use a
n
Sharmistha jat wrote:
Dear All,
I have applied for tomcat proxy project, but i needed a little more
information than given in the project idea, to start with the design of
proxy.
So i would like to know more about the following:
1) Type of proxy [reverse,content filter,caching etc].
Just a r
Sharmistha jat wrote:
So, now i would try to install a tomcat cluster and make a simple
servlet proxy [reverse] for it, then add in load-balancing logic to it
Yep thst is the idea.
+++ CUT +++
I have studied a number of servlet proxies like j2ep, noodle & Http
Proxy
Servlet in past days.
better starting point.
Costin
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 1:18 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Sharmistha jat wrote:
So, now i would try to install a tomcat cluster and make a simple
servlet proxy [reverse] for it, then add in load-balancing logic to it
Yep thst is the idea.
+++ CUT +++
I
Anas Ahmed wrote:
Where can I find petter
Ask the question(s) here, Peter may answer but also most of the
developers could help.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Anas
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:27:20 +0100
From: ma...@apache.org
To: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: participate in tomcat 7
A
Mark Thomas wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Konstantin
Kolinko has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Please join me in welcoming him.
+1 :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscri
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Looks OK :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
--
On 04/30/2010 08:51 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> There is a difference in Comet API that will require all TC6 Comet
> applications
> to be patched and recompiled before deploying them to TC7:
>
> Comet classes were moved from "org.apache.catalina" to
> "org.apache.catalina.comet".
>
> What do
On 05/02/2010 10:52 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 04:02 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>> -// endpoint.processSocket(this.socket,
>> SocketStatus.STOP);
>> +try {
>> +asyncDispatch(SocketStatus.STOP); // What to do
>> with retu
On 05/17/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
> blog post. It can be previewed here:
>
> http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released
>
> Suggestions for improvements welcome.
>
> Note the li
On 05/18/2010 03:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/05/2010 22:31, Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
>>> blog post. It can be previewed here:
>>>
>>> http://blogs.apache.org/previe
On 05/17/2010 07:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I've just completed testing of trunk.
>
> Unit tests - pass
>
> Servlet 3.0 TCK
> - BIO with security manager - pass
> - NIO with security manager - pass (expected failures due to bug 49284)
> - APR/native with security manager - pass
I am still wo
On 05/19/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/05/2010 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The 7.0.0-RC2 tag is
>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Alpha based on 7.0.0-RC2
>> [ ] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC2
>> [ ] Stable - go ahead
On 05/19/2010 02:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> [X] +1 Move them.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 05/19/2010 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 05/19/2010 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/05/2010 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The 7.0.0-RC2 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Alpha based on 7.0
On 05/20/2010 11:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/05/2010 07:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The TC tests are crashing the JVM with and without my patch. Should I
>> commit the patch anyway?
>
> The TCK tests?
No: in the TC tests: ant tests.
The problem is located in Apr
On 05/21/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> We found a few issues in RC2 so I'm going to create RC3. Before I do,
> are there any other issues in RC2 that need fixing? If no-one speaks up
> I'll roll RC3 over the weekend.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 05/25/2010 01:04 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/05/2010 23:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC3
>> can be obtained from:
>> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC3/
>> The svn tag is:
>> http://svn.apache.org/
On 05/24/2010 12:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> The next Tomcat 7.0.0 release candiate is ready for testing. 7.0.0-RC3
> can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.0-RC3/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_0_RC3/
Hi,
What about putting back the original tomcat logo? (The 10th one is there
since 2009-10-23).
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.a
On 06/04/2010 09:57 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When can we make 6.0.27?
>
> There were a couple of important fixes since 6.0.26, like BZ 48903
> (classloader deadlock).
>
> I think it is about time to make 6.0.27.
+1 I will start to prepare the stuff. Tag on Monday, packaging , vot
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.27 on Monday (European morning) and start the release
process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.
On 06/13/2010 11:09 AM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> Hi Jenn-Frederic,
>
> at the 6.0.26 Release we have deployed a wrong juli.jar at the maven repo:
>
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/m2-repository/org/apache/tomcat/juli/6.0.26/juli-6.0.26.jar
>
>
> This jar is the commons-logging/log4j juli pack
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.27/
According to the release process, the 6.0.27 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_27 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are some methods in SSLContext to create and use a new BIO. Are
>> there
>> any examples/tests for this ? I can't find how to attach the BIO to a
>> socket, it seems SSL_set_bio is never
On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
> wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2010 07:08 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2010 12:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Ther
On 06/17/2010 04:30 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:56 AM, jean-frederic clere <mailto:jfcl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2010 07:44 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:14 PM, jean-frederic clere
On 06/27/2010 01:02 PM, p...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pero
> Date: Sun Jun 27 11:02:10 2010
> New Revision: 958362
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=958362&view=rev
> Log:
> Start JioEndpoint timeout thread, to handle timeout a AsyncListener.
>
> Added:
> tomcat/trunk/test/org/apac
Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and propose the vote for 6.0.28
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v
On 06/30/2010 05:20 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/6/29 jean-frederic clere :
>> Due to bugs (49445 and 49424) and as I was not able to finish the
>> release process quickly (because of working remotely) and as releases
>> are cheap we would like to abandon 6.0.27 and
On 07/01/2010 09:28 AM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> nice to see some activity on this thread.
>
>> If you were following the dev list you would have seen that
>> Jean-Frederic has already vetoed the change Peter made on the basis
>> that it breaks the TCK. That suggests that Peter's anal
On 07/02/2010 03:08 PM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> ...
>> Exact details are forbidden, but I'm sure there'll be some information
>> as soon as someone had time to dig into it.
>
> this was exactly what I feared. This is an additional argument for an
> open source test suite.
I
On 07/01/2010 06:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The builds for Tomcat 5.5.30 are ready for testing and approval.
> The candidates binaries are available here:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~jim/tomcat-5.5/
>
> According to the release process, the 5.5.30 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_5
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
On 07/09/2010 05:20 PM, Marc Guillemot wrote:
> Hi Jean-Frédéric,
>
> why does http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/ always say:
>
> "Current stable version is 6.0.26"
Should be OK soon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubs
On 06/14/2010 06:19 PM, Peter Roßbach wrote:
> Hi Jean-Frederic,
>
> only the last 6.0.26 release has a wrong normal juli.jar. Can you
> correct this? Please, made a check after
> tomcat 6.0.27 maven publish.
I think it should be ok in 6.0.28.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> It looks like we have a regression in the cookie handling. Invalidating
> the session and then requesting a new session results in a mal-formed
> header (in trunk) and I have seen similar reports from one of our
> support customers on 6.0.28.
On 07/16/2010 01:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 16.07.2010 12:30, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 16/07/2010 08:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2010 11:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like we have a regression in
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 07/19/2010 07:16 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/07/2010 23:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 18.07.2010 02:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 18/07/2010 00:57, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Jul 17 23:57:23 2010
New Revision: 965150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/view
On 07/19/2010 06:33 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.29/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.29 build corresponding to the
> tag TOMCAT_6_0_29 is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ]
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.29 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.28.
Apache Tomcat 6.0 includes new features over Apache Tomcat 5.5,
including support for the new Servlet 2.5 and JSP 2.1 specifications, a
refactored
On 08/24/2010 09:02 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Aug 24 07:02:44 2010
> New Revision: 988409
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988409&view=rev
> Log:
> Make 1.4.x mandatory at build time as well
The 1.3.x apr_pool_pre_cleanup_register doesn't work?
Cheers
Jean
On 08/24/2010 10:48 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:23 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> This is for trunk (tcnative 1.2.x)
>> Branch 1.1.x will have apr-1.3.x dependency with those
>> functions backported after found stable.
>> Pool pre cleanup is easily backportable and is
>> alre
On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
> New Revision: 988537
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537&view=rev
> Log:
> Allow using vedor APR that have lower then required version but required API
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/native
On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: mturk
>> Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
>> New Revision: 988537
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=988537&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Al
On 08/24/2010 04:30 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 04:07 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 08/24/2010 03:33 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Tue Aug 24 13:33:18 2010
>>> New Revision: 988537
>>>
>>> URL: ht
On 09/13/2010 11:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as
> 6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears
>
> version.patch=29
>
> was used rather than
>
> version.build=29
>
> It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used
Hi,
We will have a meetup during the ApacheConNA2010 on Thursday 4th at
20h00. Meetups are free to attend and a opportunity to have short
presentation and discussion about the new Tomcat 7 and the latest
improvement done in the code.
See http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatAtApacheConNA2010 and re
On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
>> New Revision: 1036150
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add recent performance improvements to chang
On 11/24/2010 07:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.5 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/tomcat-7/v7.0.5/
> The svn tag is:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc7.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_7_0_5/
>
> As with
On 11/30/2010 09:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/11/2010 08:17, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Something looks broken (that is not new I think).
>
> Yes, but it is your test environment ;)
Yes I had a build.properties with
junit.home=${user.home}/java/junit3.8.1 probably for a o
On 12/01/2010 07:46 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Rainer,
>
> On 11/1/2010 10:56 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> On 01.11.2010 15:32, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Mladen,
>>>
>>> On 11/1/2010 7:43 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
Apache
On 01/04/2011 11:44 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
It has been a while since 6.0.29 and there have been a few requests for
this on the users list. Jean-Frederic, do you have any plans for 6.0.30
at this point?
Next week :D
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
301 - 400 of 764 matches
Mail list logo
