On 09/13/2010 11:51 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I just spotted that in a couple of places 6.0.29 reports itself as > 6.0.0.29. Looking at the tag, it appears > > version.patch=29 > > was used rather than > > version.build=29 > > It isn't a major issue as in most places the version property is used > (which is set to 6.0.29). > > Just something to keep in mind when we start thinking about timing for > 6.0.30.
+1 Cheers Jean-Frederic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
