Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49999] New: More bugs

2010-09-24 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 9/24/2010 4:55 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Wesley Acheson [mailto:wesley.ache...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4] New: More bugs > >> Pardon my language but WTF? > > I think Mr Rowe is actually issuing a compliment to the sterling efforts of > Mark T, albeit i

Re: Tomcat native ia64 binaries wrong?

2010-10-27 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 10/27/2010 3:10 AM, Tim Whittington wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> On 10/26/2010 11:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't have the hardware to test if this is an issue on ia64 this but >>> the following files have the same MD5 hash: >>> >>> >>>

Re: svn commit: r1029423 - in /tomcat: tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2010-11-01 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 11/1/2010 5:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 01/11/2010 06:43, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: >> 2010/11/1 Mark Thomas : >>> On 31/10/2010 13:13, kkoli...@apache.org wrote: Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt --- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original) +++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/S

Re: RemoteIpValve advices

2011-01-31 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 1/29/2011 1:07 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: >> I'd certainly like to see some more information on this usage. With more >> info we can figure out what solution makes the most sense. Anything we >> can do to make Beanstalk easier to use is good although I would prefer >> to keep it generic if we can. A

Re: Tomcat, OpenSSL and FIPS

2011-01-31 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 1/30/2011 8:20 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Chris, > > On 1/27/2011 3:54 PM, Chris Beckey wrote: >> Chris, >> To set some context, I posted on the tomcat users list serve a question >> about running OpenSSL in FIPS mode under Tomcat. >> The last communication was that you may investiga

Re: Connection draining when upload to large

2011-02-10 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/10/2011 7:04 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Servlet 3 standardizes file uploads. It contains the ability to limit on > request size, > pretty much the same as commons fileupload supported for many years. > > It seems when this conditions triggers the rest of the request inout stream > is still >

Re: Connection draining when upload to large

2011-02-17 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/17/2011 4:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > > I'm not particularly comfortable with this. I'm having a hard time > coming up with a use case where some requests are swallowed and some are > not. I think I'd prefer a per Connector or per Context attribute. I need > to read the right part of the HTTP

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21

2009-12-21 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: > On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is: >> [X] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [ ] Stable >> > > tcnat

Re: Fwd: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

2010-02-03 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/3/2010 10:45 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/02/2010 13:21, Yoav Shapira wrote: >> Please see Justin's proposal below for the Incubator. (From a >> general, public list.) >> >> I think it'd be great for Tomcat to do the same. Your thoughts / votes? > > Generally +1. Need to think about how w

Re: 6.0.24 service.bat is missing

2010-02-03 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/3/2010 12:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/02/2010 18:07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: >> and all the .exe files are gone, from the .zip file, this is a pain in >> the ass, no windows without installer? >> why the change from .20 to .24? should just be a build update? > > As per the discus

Re: Fwd: Switching incubator.apache.org to svnpubsub?

2010-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/4/2010 3:44 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2010/2/3 William A. Rowe Jr. : >> That said, there are now two platforms, your original svn.apache.org space >> and now dist.apache.org/repos/dist/, which is for publishing artifacts. It >> might make sense to mirror the p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20

2010-02-26 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/10/2010 4:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > > Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is: > > [ ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions > [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is > [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are How well is it interacting with Op

Re: Console for Tomcat

2010-03-02 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/2/2010 7:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 02/03/2010 00:20, Sandro Martini wrote: > >> For a Full Administration Console (I don't see this since a long time) >> we have to see later, this is complex and requires many features ... > > This is the bit that, to me, offers an opportunity for real

Re: Tomcat at the next ApacheCon

2010-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/18/2010 11:00 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > We all want to see a Tomcat track at the ApacheConNA2010, don't we? > > I have created a wiki page to collect the presentation proposals. > Fell free to add the stuff you would like to present at the ApacheCon. > The tomcat PMC will revi

Re: Will your project feature at ApacheCon North America 2010?

2010-03-23 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/22/2010 9:35 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Apologies for the broadcast message... > > In thinking about ApacheCon 2010, I began to wonder if there is interest in > creating an "Enterprise Java" track for the conference. I think there is the > potential for a lot of interesting content. Many of

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 7.0.0 based on Tomcat 7.0.0 RC1

2010-04-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote: > > Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are > usually published on the web-site) so better safe than sorry. SVN is a development/work product area. Although now we have dist.apache.org/ which is, pretty clearly, a dist'ribution poin

Re: [VOTE] Release Tomcat 7.0.0 based on Tomcat 7.0.0 RC1

2010-04-14 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 4/14/2010 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 14/04/2010, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 4/14/2010 4:22 PM, sebb wrote: >> > >> > Also, SVN is considered by some to be publishing code (e.g. links are >> > usually published on the web-site) so better safe than

Re: http workshop

2019-02-14 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:22 AM Stefan Eissing wrote: > The HTTP Workshop is returning 2019 on April 2-4 in Amsterdam ( > https://github.com/httpworkshop/workshop2019). While I attended the last > three shops(?), I think it would be a good opportunity for someone else > from the team to go there

Re: http workshop

2019-02-15 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 2:36 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/02/2019 19:52, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:22 AM Stefan Eissing < > stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> > > wrote: > > > > >> The HTTP WS organisers expressed the wish

mod_jk AM_MAINTAINER_MODE nightmares

2013-05-24 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
Folks, it is abusive to force all builds of mod_jk to invoke the whole automake toolchain; it isn't practical to expect automake to work on all platforms which mod_jk is happy to compile under. Even the root of automake, m4 itself, is often flakey under some of these OS distributions. Automake o

<    1   2   3