On 10/27/2010 3:10 AM, Tim Whittington wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 10/26/2010 11:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't have the hardware to test if this is an issue on ia64 this but >>> the following files have the same MD5 hash: >>> >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.20/binaries/win64/ia64/tcnative-1.dll >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.20/binaries/win32/tcnative-1.dll >>> >>> That looks suspicious to me. I'd expect the x86 and ia64 binaries to be >>> different. >>> >> >> Right, this is actually x86 binary, not an ia64 one. >> Seems I did a wrong upload back in February. >> >> Since you are the first one that figured that out >> after more then 8 months, it just convinces me that >> we should drop IA64 binaries altogether. > > +1. > I've seen one non HP-UX IA64 system in 10 years, and that was RHEL. > >> At least I don't plan to produce them any more
As a reference, Microsoft has dropped IA64... old news, I know... http://www.pcworld.com/article/193426/microsoft_ending_support_for_itanium.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
