w I may proceed.
I look forward to working with all of you.
Sincerely,
Paul Shemansky
pretty much works on the area of
> their own interest.
> A good place to start is the bug database, and submit patches to the
> bugzilla database.
> for example
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&order=relevance+desc&bug_status=__open__&
volunteer efforts towards the the
true Mavenization of the Tomcat build.
Should we take a vote on this? As a proof-of-concept, may I start a
Maven2-managed SVN branch somehow?
Sincerely,
Paul Shemansky
Maven 2 Evangelist
On 10/17/07, Rémy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Shemansky wrote:
> > My Fellow Code Monkeys,
.
> > My first day here, I noticed that we
> > are downloading DBCP source files and compiling them with the Tomcat build.
> > In my humble opi
rtainly
be something that I could dedicate myself to, and I believe I could
make the transition seamless for all of us. I look forward to hearing
from you. Whether you vote Yes or No, I am still happy to be working
with you. :)
Thank You,
Paul Shemansky
Maven 2 Evangelist / Open-Source Advocate /
:21 -0400, Paul Shemansky wrote:
> > It is not my intention to start a flame war between Ant and Maven
> > users, but merely to propose Maven 2 to this group, and respectfully
> > use this thread to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
> > switching Tomcat's build pr
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> to elaborate more for you, 6.0.x is our current 6.0 release branch.
> We are using RTC, Review-Then-Commit policy here, and introducing maven
> into a stable release branch like this, is probably not the best idea.
> What you should
If nothing else comes out of this discussion thread, we will at least
hear build-process opinions from above-average developers. Thank you
in advance to all that reply.
In response to Filip :
On 10/17/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lemme give you my feedback and some hi
On 10/17/07, Costin Manolache <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But if you want to create a maven build file ( or a Makefile, or
> eclipse/netbeans projects, etc :-) that builds tomcat - I personally don't
> see a problem with that - as long as it doesn't require moving code around
> and can play nicely
On 10/17/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul Shemansky wrote:
> > Key features that may be useful to us are :
> >
> > - The Standard Directory Layout - Specifically, multi-module builds.
> > This might make managing individual components easier for
Hi Yoav,
> On 10/19/07, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/19/07, Paul Shemansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
> > "as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on
John,
On 10/18/07, jkew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Paul,
> I agree with Costin.
> -1 to default
Default is out of the question.
> +1 to alternative
I'm going to keep waiting for more a few more +1s in the
"as-an-alternate" category before doing any real work on it.
>
> Some points:
>
> 1. I
William,
FYI - I love Gentoo.
On 10/18/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gentoo's vote -1 for Tomcat using Maven to build instead of Ant :)
>
> On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 23:26 -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
> > I'm pretty much going to agree with Costin on this one. I have no object
For what it's worth :)
+1
On 10/19/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, sending a little email to lobby for a useful change. To the contrary
> of comments and vetoes to this change, it doesn't change existing
> behavior, it simplifies it, and also adds the NIO connector to
Bill,
The last thing that I want to be responsible for is introducing a
stumbling block for all of the Tomcat developers and users. This
thread should have also included "Maven 2 - Migrate, Integrate, or
Annihilate".
On 10/18/07, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty much going to
On 10/18/07, Mary Joseph <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> i have been a passive listener all the while but i feel its time for change.
> I vote for Maven
> regards,
> Mary
Thank you, Mary. However, I believe we are out-numbered. :)
-
On 10/18/07, Peter Rossbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes!
>
> I can't see that maven build is better choice.
>
> Peter
>
> Vote -1 for build with maven!
What if Maven 2 is added in co-existence, instead of as a replacement?
-
On 10/17/07, Konstantin Kolinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Paul!
> You may start playing in some sandbox, creating a directory structure
> there, and pulling branches of tomcat code through the use of
> svn:externals property. It is called creating a view.
Thanks Konstantin,
I agree with t
While browsing the project, I noticed that there is an unused
separation of Catalina Ant JMX resources. If this was unintended, a
possible cleanup patch is attached.
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/ant/jmx/JMXAccessorEqualsCondition.java
19 matches
Mail list logo
