On Aug 20, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 8/20/13 9:25 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 20/08/2013 14:13, Nick Williams wrote:
>>> I'm working on implementing bugzilla 55317. It's a pretty important
>>> change (weaving) to a
On Aug 20, 2013, at 12:41 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Nick,
>
> On 8/20/13 1:25 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> tcnative can be built on Max OS X like this:
>>
>> $ cd $CATALINA_HOME/bin
>> $ tar xzf tomcat-native.tar.gz
>> $ cd tomcat-native-*-src/jni/native
>> $ ./configure --with-apr=
On Aug 20, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 20/08/2013 18:47, Nick Williams wrote:
>> My remaining original concern was the best approach for weaving byte
>> code in Tomcat's unit tests, which I detailed in an earlier message.
>
> Use the Weaver to completel
On Aug 21, 2013, at 2:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/08/2013 01:24, Nick Williams wrote:
>
>> My backup idea is slightly less clean but, IMO, still more clean than adding
>> ASM as a test-time dependency and trying to figure all of that out. I
>> locally compiled f
On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what the problem is. It looks like the WebSocket
> SCI is being registered twice or is running twice but I can't reproduce
> the problem. Anyone got any ideas?
>
> Currently, my plan is to add some logging to the SCI registra
On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 August 2013 14:48, Christopher Schultz
> wrote:
>> Nick,
>>
>> On 8/20/13 8:24 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
>>> I ran in to a roadblock with this idea. Part of the byte code of a
>>> class includes the
I have latest-ish from trunk (< 2 days old) and compiled without issue. When I
tried to run it, however, console output indicates a serious issue creating
DataSource resources:
21-Aug-2013 17:18:30.800 WARNING [localhost-startStop-1]
org.apache.catalina.core.NamingContextListener.addResource Fa
On Aug 21, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Nick Williams wrote:
> I have latest-ish from trunk (< 2 days old) and compiled without issue. When
> I tried to run it, however, console output indicates a serious issue creating
> DataSource resources:
>
> 21-Aug-2013 17:18:30.800 WARNING [loc
On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>
> Nick Williams changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
>
On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/08/2013 13:36, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>>>
>>> Nick Willi
On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 11:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 11:09, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Mon Sep 9 10:09:36 2013
>>> New Revision: 1521023
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1521023
>>> Log:
>>> Fix wrongly named annot
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Mark,
>
> On 9/10/13 3:21 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Tue Sep 10 19:21:22 2013
>> New Revision: 1521594
>
> It's amazing how a relatively small number of changes can take a page
> from 1996 to ... well, at least
On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/9/11 Mark Thomas :
>> On 11/09/2013 14:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2013/9/11 :
Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 11 11:59:37 2013
New Revision: 1521817
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1521817
Log:
Comme
Mark,
I'm working on revisions to my patch for BZ 55317 based on your feedback. In
this feedback you said:
> 5. I'm not a fan of the org.apache.tomcat.unittest package unless the classes
> concerned are going to be used by multiple tests across multiple packages.
I put org.apache.tomcat.unitte
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 18:31, Nick Williams wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I'm working on revisions to my patch for BZ 55317 based on your
>> feedback. In this feedback you said:
>>
>>> 5. I'm not a fan of t
On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:28 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>
> --- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
> (In reply to Nick Williams from comment #15)
>> Created attachment 30749 [details]
>> Proposed implementatio
On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 19/09/2013 16:31, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 AM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
Author: markt Date: Thu Sep 19 13:07:02 2013 New Revision:
1524727
>>
On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 20/09/2013 16:02, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>>> The only ordering concern for SCIs in the spec is that they are
>>> "discovered" following the classloader delegation model. This will
>>> t
On Sep 21, 2013, at 6:07 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2013/9/21 Mark Thomas :
>> On 20/09/2013 08:38, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.43 release is now available for voting.
>>> This release candidate contains JSR-356 Java WebSocket 1.0 implementation.
>>> Note that
This is very off topic, and for that I apologize. I'm working on fixing a bug
in Log4j 2, and we've discovered something that just doesn't make any sense to
me. I /believe/ it's a problem with WebLogic's implementation of the Servlet
3.0 specification, but I could be wrong, and based on my previ
On Sep 24, 2013, at 11:00 AM, Rossen Stoyanchev wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> The necessary update to the script that uploads those JARs to the Maven
>> repo was missed. I think I have fixed it locally but need to test it
>> from somewhere with connectivity.
101 - 121 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
