Jess Holle wrote:
Agreed, but this is concerning *both* mod_jk and mod_proxy and I've
been scolded for cross posting...
At the core, I'm looking for 2 things:
1. Something to limit the maximum impact of having many dead
workers under a load balancer on norma
could have a Tomcat front-end load
balancing over Tomcats without any need for the native annoyances of httpd.
--
Jess Holle
P.S. Yes, I like httpd compared to other native alternatives, but having
to do any builds and patches in native code, worrying about platform
nuances, etc, is such a nui
much appreciated.
--
Jess Holle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my of generating browser HTML one way and all other HTML some
other way -- unless one forgoes any technology, like JSP, that relies on
the servlet API.
Henri Gomez wrote:
There was a JNI connector sometimes ago.
I'm unsure if it's still maintened
2008/9/17 Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
web server connector -- that would be a clear user group
question.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 07:48 -0500, Jess Holle wrote:
Is there an in-process connector for Tomcat somewhere out there?
Specifically I want to be able to embed Tomcat and use JSPs, etc, to
generate HTML b
.
It is hard to understand why one should be unable to re-use one's JSPs
and servlet investment to produce HTML for other purposes than HTTP
responses.// It is also quite unclear to me why there appears to be no
interest in addressing this need.
--
Jess Holle
Jess Holle wrote:
I fi
Cool.
Thanks for the helpful reply.
I just wish I could have figured out how to word my question better so
as to elicit this helpful information to start with -- instead of
getting told I was posting to the wrong group and chasing my tail with it.
--
Jess Holle
Costin Manolache wrote
I won't say I understand all the usages perfectly myself, but I also
stumbled on this mess.
I made a few such changes our Tomcat in the session package in
conjunction with changes to PersistentManagerBase, FileStore, JDBCStore,
etc (as these do too much thrashing reading all sessions from
dis
ancer or mod_jk is
just so much harder than doing this sort of thing in Java. Plus there's
the benefit of "build once run anywhere", i.e. cross-platform binaries.
--
Jess Holle
P.S. Caching at this level is quite uninteresting to me -- but could
seemingly be added via ser
vel of log verbosity just isn't acceptable in cases where one is load
balancing over a sparsely populated range of server ports, for instance.
--
Jess Holle
P.S. I already proposed a similar patch for mod_proxy_balancer/ajp.
There appear to be additional issues there (having to do wit
and SJWS support as well as Apache 2.2 and so will need to rely on the
jk/tc connectors in these cases in any case and will need to be able to
configure any such setting in all cases.]
--
Jess Holle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
now I have no sense as to what makes
Tomcat 7 still a "beta" at this point.
--
Jess Holle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Thanks for the detailed reply!
On 10/20/2010 7:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/10/2010 06:39, Jess Holle wrote:
On 10/20/2010 5:45 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/10/2010 08:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Ping. Just a gentle reminder that there are ~2 days left for this vote.
So far we have 1 vote
bugs/behaviors and will likely never be attractive to me. NIO
might be (once all the kinks were worked out), but there is no NIO
implementation of the AJP connector.
--
Jess Holle
On 4/6/2011 5:02 PM, Tim Whittington wrote:
Given the severity of
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
48616> is
labeled as a blocker rather than a regression, but is apparently also a
regression.
Any other regressions to be aware of when considering 6.0.24?
--
Jess Holle
On 2/16/2010 5:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
for a 6.
code.
The same cannot be said for HTTP proxying, which throws the proxying
details in your face and leaves you scrambling with various valves, etc,
to hide these details from web applications that care about the logical,
not physical, truth of the situation.
--
Jess Holle
ode across any
container that supports JASPIC [as Mark notes] and (2) still use
standard security constraints in one's web.xml to configure
authentication constraints.
--
Jess Holle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns
Naively, looking at the Tomcat documentation and note the comparison
table there makes it appear that:
1. NIO2 offers everything NIO does
2. NIO cannot offer true blocking IO, whereas NIO2 can
If that's not true, then the documentation should be updated at least
And, of course, NIO2 just s
Given the regression in startup speed due to the web socket scanning, it
would be /really/ nice if this release included clear notes on how one
can best disable this.
On 12/9/2013 4:41 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
Hi,
2013/11/16 Violeta Georgieva
Hi,
I'm planning to prepare 7.0.48 for voti
regression, however, /then /there's an argument to
take this more seriously.
--
Jess Holle
.
I'll patch this in my own Tomcat, but I wanted to notify the community so:
1. I don't have to maintain this patch long term and
2. The Tomcat community can review the correctness/sanity of this code
change and decide whether the correct fix is simply adding a null
check or something larger.
--
Jess Holle
e 7.0.36 is announced, then they'll just assume Tomcat is no
good -- but how many folk will really fall into that category?
--
Jess Holle
about this change -- push
those which ran afoul of this to fix their code or patch the fix back
into our Tomcat.
--
Jess Holle
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Thanks for the feedback.
It looks like our issues are tracing back to a single bad tag class
implementation.
On 1/30/2013 6:54 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/1/30 Jess Holle :
Is anyone else seeing regressions due to this change?
They appear as NullPointerExceptions from
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
